Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
FFLS vs IVV: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, FFLS returned −0.1% to IVV's +14.8%, and IVV charges 0.03% to FFLS's 1.24%.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about FFLS and IVV
Net assets: $43m on Aug 31, 2026 for The Future Fund Long/Short ETF, and $872.0bn on Nov 3, 2026 for iShares Core S&P 500 ETF.
Pair scorecard
IVV costs 1.21 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 14.9 points.
| Measure | FFLS | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | −0.1% | +14.8% |
| Total return, 52 weeks | +1.3% | |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | not published | S&P 500 |
| Treasury bills, 52 weeks | +3.7% | |
| Against cash | 2.4 points behind | |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 1.24% | 0.03% |
| Net assets, FFLS as of Aug 31, 2026 and IVV as of Nov 3, 2026 | $43m | $872.0bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | not published | |
| In the S&P 500, by weight | 100% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 37.3% | |
| Risk | ||
| Correlation with the S&P 500’s weekly returns | +0.65 | |
| Beta to the S&P 500 | +0.61: about 0.61% for each 1% | |
| Its average week when the S&P 500 fell | fell 0.70% | |
| Down-week capture | 65.7% | |
| Weeks the S&P 500 fell | 26 of 52, by 1.07% on average | |
Side by side
FFLS and IVV on the fields both publish, as of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
FFLS
FFLS is a long-short equity fund. ETFIQ measures what every alternatives fund is sold on: whether it moves differently from the stock market. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, its weekly returns had a correlation of +0.65 with the S&P 500’s and a beta of +0.61, so for each 1% the index moved it moved about 0.61% the same way. The S&P 500 fell in 26 of those 52 weeks, by 1.07% on average. In the same weeks FFLS fell 0.70% on average, a down-week capture of 65.7%. Over the same 52 weeks FFLS returned +1.3% and a Treasury bill fund +3.7%, so it finished 2.4 percentage points behind cash.
IVV
IVV tracks the S&P 500. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 it returned +14.8% with distributions reinvested, against +14.8% for its benchmark, the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Nov 3, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 505 positions, with the top ten at 37.3%.
Questions people ask
- Are FFLS and IVV in the same category?
- FFLS is an alternatives ETF and IVV is a stock ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
- Which returned more over the last year, FFLS or IVV?
- In the year to Nov 4, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FFLS returned −0.1% and IVV +14.8%.
- Which is cheaper, FFLS or IVV?
- IVV is cheaper, by 1.21 percentage points a year. That is about $121 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, FFLS against IVV, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ffls-vs-ivv
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). FFLS against IVV. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ffls-vs-ivv
[FFLS against IVV (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ffls-vs-ivv)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.