Which returned more over the last year, FFLS or GLD?

In the year to Sep 19, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FFLS returned −5.0% and GLD returned +19.5%, so GLD returned more.

Which is cheaper, FFLS or GLD?

FFLS charges 1.24% a year and GLD charges 0.40%, so GLD is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Are FFLS and GLD the same kind of fund?

No. FFLS is an alternatives ETF and GLD is a commodity ETF, so they are built for different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and what each actually holds.

Data as of Sep 19, 2026.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

FFLS vs GLD: how they differ

Over the year GLD returned more, +19.5% to FFLS's −5.0%, and GLD charges 0.40% to FFLS's 1.24%.

The Future Fund Long/Short ETF and SPDR Gold Shares.

FFLS and GLD on the fields both publish, as of Sep 19, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	FFLS The Future Fund Long/Short ETF	GLD SPDR Gold Shares
Where it sits	Alternatives ETF	Core fund
Issuer	The Future Fund	State Street
What it is	Long-short equity	Holds gold
Total return, 1 year	−5.0%	+19.5%
S&P 500 over the same days	+16.6%	+16.6%
Gap to the S&P 500	−21.6 pts	+3.0 pts
Expense ratio	1.24%	0.40%
Net assets	$43m	$147.8bn

FFLS in plain words

FFLS is a long-short equity fund. ETFIQ measures what every alternatives fund is sold on: whether it moves differently from the stock market. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, its weekly returns had a correlation of +0.69 with the S&P 500’s and a beta of +0.64, so for each 1% the index moved it moved about 0.64% the same way. The S&P 500 fell in 22 of those 52 weeks, by 1.24% on average. In the same weeks FFLS fell 1.05% on average, a down-week capture of 84.7%. Over the same 52 weeks FFLS returned −4.7% and a Treasury bill fund +3.6%, so it finished 8.3 percentage points behind cash.

GLD in plain words

GLD holds gold. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 it returned +19.5% with distributions reinvested, against +16.6% for the S&P 500 and +21.8% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.40% a year. It sat 19.1% below its high of Jan 29, 2026 on Sep 18, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FFLS or GLD?: In the year to Sep 19, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FFLS returned −5.0% and GLD returned +19.5%, so GLD returned more.
Which is cheaper, FFLS or GLD?: FFLS charges 1.24% a year and GLD charges 0.40%, so GLD is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Are FFLS and GLD the same kind of fund?: No. FFLS is an alternatives ETF and GLD is a commodity ETF, so they are built for different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and what each actually holds.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

FFLS against GLD, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 19, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, FFLS against GLD, data as of Sep 19, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ffls-vs-gld Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources