Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
FFLS vs GLD: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, FFLS returned −0.1% to GLD's +2.8%, and GLD charges 0.40% to FFLS's 1.24%.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about FFLS and GLD
Net assets: $43m on Aug 31, 2026 for The Future Fund Long/Short ETF, and $131.3bn on Nov 3, 2026 for SPDR Gold Shares.
Pair scorecard
GLD costs 0.84 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 2.9 points.
| Measure | FFLS | GLD |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | −0.1% | +2.8% |
| Total return, 52 weeks | +1.3% | |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 24.9%, high on Jan 29, 2026 | |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | not published | Gold |
| Treasury bills, 52 weeks | +3.7% | |
| Against cash | 2.4 points behind | |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 1.24% | 0.40% |
| Net assets, FFLS as of Aug 31, 2026 and GLD as of Nov 3, 2026 | $43m | $131.3bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | not published | |
| Risk | ||
| Correlation with the S&P 500’s weekly returns | +0.65 | |
| Beta to the S&P 500 | +0.61: about 0.61% for each 1% | |
| Its average week when the S&P 500 fell | fell 0.70% | |
| Down-week capture | 65.7% | |
| Weeks the S&P 500 fell | 26 of 52, by 1.07% on average | |
Risk and return
Jun 30, 2023 to Oct 30, 2026 · 174 weekly returnsFrom Jun 2023 to Oct 2026, GLD returned more: +99.6% to +28.9%. FFLS swung less: 11.2% to 18.4%. FFLS fell less at its worst: −10.5% to −26.5%.
Full scorecard
9 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | FFLS | GLD | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +28.9% | +99.6% | GLD | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +7.9% | +22.9% | GLD | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | +17.0% | +99.6% | GLD | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 11.2% | 18.4% | FFLS | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 7.4% | 11.8% | FFLS | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −10.5% | −26.5% | FFLS | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | 0.33 | 0.97 | GLD | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 0.50 | 1.51 | GLD | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Calmar | 0.75 | 0.87 | GLD | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 174 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
Side by side
FFLS and GLD on the fields both publish, as of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
Client brief:
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
FFLS
FFLS is a long-short equity fund. ETFIQ measures what every alternatives fund is sold on: whether it moves differently from the stock market. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, its weekly returns had a correlation of +0.65 with the S&P 500’s and a beta of +0.61, so for each 1% the index moved it moved about 0.61% the same way. The S&P 500 fell in 26 of those 52 weeks, by 1.07% on average. In the same weeks FFLS fell 0.70% on average, a down-week capture of 65.7%. Over the same 52 weeks FFLS returned +1.3% and a Treasury bill fund +3.7%, so it finished 2.4 percentage points behind cash.
Its expense ratio is 0.40% a year, for the three months to Jun 30, 2026, as its 10-Q states.
GLD holds gold. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 it returned +2.8% with distributions reinvested, against +2.9% for its benchmark, the price of gold. It sat 24.9% below its high of Jan 29, 2026 on Nov 4, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Are FFLS and GLD in the same category?
- FFLS is an alternatives ETF and GLD is a commodity ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
- Which returned more over the last year, FFLS or GLD?
- In the year to Nov 4, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FFLS returned −0.1% and GLD +2.8%.
- Which is cheaper, FFLS or GLD?
- GLD is cheaper, by 0.84 percentage points a year. That is about $84 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's own filings.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, FFLS against GLD, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ffls-vs-gld
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). FFLS against GLD. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ffls-vs-gld
[FFLS against GLD (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ffls-vs-gld)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.