Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
FPX vs XMHQ: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, FPX returned +2.9% to XMHQ's +12.8%; 2% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about FPX and XMHQ
Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $1.4bn for First Trust US Equity Opportunities ETF and $5.6bn for Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF.
Pair scorecard
XMHQ costs 0.32 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 9.9 points; XMHQ is 4.0 times larger.
| Measure | FPX | XMHQ |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +2.9% | +12.8% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 15.9%, high on Jun 30, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | IPOX -100 U.S. Index | S&P MidCap 400 Quality Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.57% | 0.25% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 | $1.4bn | $5.6bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 2% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 46.4% | 30.7% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, FPX and XMHQ hold 2% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.
half
2% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
FPX and XMHQ on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
FPX and XMHQ do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?
- What each follows. FPX follows IPOX -100 U.S. Index and XMHQ follows S&P MidCap 400 Quality Index.
- Holdings in common. 2% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 FPX returned +2.9% and XMHQ +12.8% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 9.9 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
FPX
FPX tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +2.9% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.57% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 51% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 99 positions, with the top ten at 46.4%. It sat 15.9% below its high of Jun 30, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
XMHQ
XMHQ tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +12.8% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 82 positions, with the top ten at 30.7%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, FPX or XMHQ?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FPX returned +2.9% and XMHQ +12.8%.
- Which is cheaper, FPX or XMHQ?
- XMHQ is cheaper, by 0.32 percentage points a year. That is about $32 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, FPX against XMHQ, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fpx-vs-xmhq
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). FPX against XMHQ. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fpx-vs-xmhq
[FPX against XMHQ (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fpx-vs-xmhq)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.