Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
FTGS vs XMHQ: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, FTGS returned +5.6% to XMHQ's +12.8%; 2% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about FTGS and XMHQ
Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $1.3bn for First Trust Growth Strength ETF and $5.6bn for Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF.
Pair scorecard
XMHQ costs 0.35 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 7.2 points; XMHQ is 4.3 times larger.
| Measure | FTGS | XMHQ |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +5.6% | +12.8% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 4.1%, high on Aug 13, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Growth Strength Index | S&P MidCap 400 Quality Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.60% | 0.25% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 | $1.3bn | $5.6bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 2% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 21.4% | 30.7% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method
Risk and return
Nov 4, 2022 to Oct 23, 2026 · 207 weekly returnsFTGS returned more: +90.1% to +80.2%. FTGS swung slightly less: 16.0% to 17.4%. FTGS fell less at its worst: −18.7% to −21.1%.
Full scorecard
9 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | FTGS | XMHQ | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +90.1% | +80.2% | FTGS | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +17.5% | +15.9% | FTGS (slight) | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | +87.3% | +67.2% | FTGS | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 16.0% | 17.4% | FTGS (slight) | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 10.2% | 11.6% | FTGS | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −18.7% | −21.1% | FTGS | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | 0.80 | 0.67 | FTGS | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 1.26 | 1.01 | FTGS | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Calmar | 0.94 | 0.75 | FTGS | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 207 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, FTGS and XMHQ hold 2% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.
half
2% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
FTGS and XMHQ on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
FTGS and XMHQ are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- What each follows. FTGS follows Growth Strength Index and XMHQ follows S&P MidCap 400 Quality Index.
- Holdings in common. 2% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 FTGS returned +5.6% and XMHQ +12.8% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 7.2 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
FTGS
FTGS tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +5.6% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.60% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 50 positions, with the top ten at 21.4%. It sat 4.1% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
XMHQ
XMHQ tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +12.8% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 82 positions, with the top ten at 30.7%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, FTGS or XMHQ?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FTGS returned +5.6% and XMHQ +12.8%.
- Which is cheaper, FTGS or XMHQ?
- XMHQ is cheaper, by 0.35 percentage points a year. That is about $35 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, FTGS against XMHQ, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ftgs-vs-xmhq
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). FTGS against XMHQ. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ftgs-vs-xmhq
[FTGS against XMHQ (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ftgs-vs-xmhq)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.