Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

FTGS vs IVOO: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, FTGS returned +5.6% to IVOO's +13.2%; 1% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about FTGS and IVOO

Net assets: $1.3bn on Oct 27, 2026 for First Trust Growth Strength ETF, and $3.7bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF.

At a glance
+5.6%
FTGS total return, 1 year
+13.2%
IVOO total return, 1 year
0.60%
FTGS expense ratio
0.07%
IVOO expense ratio

Pair scorecard

IVOO costs 0.53 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 7.6 points.

FTGS vs IVOO: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureFTGSIVOO
Return
Total return, 1 year+5.6%+13.2%
Drawdown
Below its high4.1%, high on Aug 13, 20266.4%, high on Aug 14, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksGrowth Strength IndexS&P MidCap 400 Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.60%0.07%
Net assets, FTGS as of Oct 27, 2026 and IVOO as of Sep 30, 2026$1.3bn$3.7bn
Holdings
Holdings in common1%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund21.4%7.8%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Nov 4, 2022 to Oct 23, 2026 · 207 weekly returns
FTGS IVOO
Return
Total return edge FTGS +90.1% +59.4%
Annualized edge FTGS +17.5% +12.4%
Price return edge FTGS +87.3% +51.0%
Risk
Volatility edge FTGS (slight) 16.0% 16.7%
Max drawdown edge FTGS −18.7% −21.0%
Downside capture 105.3% 99.7%
Beta 1.05 0.99
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge FTGS 0.80 0.51
Sortino edge FTGS 1.26 0.75
Treynor 0.123 0.112
Calmar edge FTGS 0.94 0.59
Against the benchmark
Alpha −3.3% a year 0.0% a year
Alpha t-stat −1.06 0.09
Information ratio −0.42 −0.01
Tracking error 6.2% 1.5%

Each against its own benchmark: FTGS against VOO, Nov 4, 2022 to Oct 23, 2026; IVOO against IJH, Sep 17, 2010 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

FTGS returned more: +90.1% to +59.4%. FTGS swung slightly less: 16.0% to 16.7%. FTGS fell less at its worst: −18.7% to −21.0%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: FTGS vs IVOO: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureFTGSIVOOEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+90.1%+59.4%FTGSPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+17.5%+12.4%FTGSTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+87.3%+51.0%FTGSPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility16.0%16.7%FTGS (slight)Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation10.2%11.4%FTGSLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−18.7%−21.0%FTGSDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture98.4%99.3%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture105.3%99.7%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.050.99Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.850.99Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.800.51FTGSReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino1.260.75FTGSReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1230.112Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.940.59FTGSAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkVOOIJHThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha−3.3% a year0.0% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat−1.060.09Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−9.5% to +2.9%−0.7% to +0.8%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio−0.42−0.01Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error6.2%1.5%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 207 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

1%

By the books each fund has filed, FTGS and IVOO hold 1% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

1% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first FTGS IVOO
United Therapeutics Corporation 2.20% 0.68%
Five Below, Inc. 2.06% 0.36%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in FTGS
Blackstone Inc. 2.17%
Fortinet, Inc. 2.17%
Delta Air Lines, Inc. 2.15%
Workday, Inc. (Class A) 2.14%
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. 2.13%
Marvell Technology, Inc. 2.12%
Palantir Technologies Inc. (Class A) 2.12%
Arista Networks, Inc. 2.10%
Only in IVOO
Twilio Inc 1.32%
Okta Inc 1.02%
TechnipFMC PLC 0.78%
nVent Electric PLC 0.76%
ATI Inc 0.76%
Entegris Inc 0.69%
XPO Inc 0.60%
Tenet Healthcare Corp 0.60%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

FTGS First Trust Growth Strength ETF IVOO Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index Tracks an index
Total return, 1 year +5.6% +13.2%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.7% (VOO) +13.2% (IJH)
Gap to its benchmark −8.1 pts vs VOO 0.0 pts vs IJH
Expense ratio 0.60% 0.07%
Already in the S&P 500 93.8% 1.6%
Holdings 50 402
Net assets, FTGS as of Oct 27, 2026 and IVOO as of Sep 30, 2026 $1.3bn $3.7bn

FTGS and IVOO on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-FE8A2CDB38

FTGS and IVOO are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. What each follows. FTGS follows Growth Strength Index and IVOO follows S&P MidCap 400 Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 1% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 FTGS returned +5.6% and IVOO +13.2% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 7.6 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

FTGS flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
FTGS

FTGS tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +5.6% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.60% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 50 positions, with the top ten at 21.4%. It sat 4.1% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

IVOO

IVOO tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +13.2% with distributions reinvested, against +13.2% for its benchmark, the S&P MidCap 400 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 2% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 402 positions, with the top ten at 7.8%. It sat 6.4% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FTGS or IVOO?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FTGS returned +5.6% and IVOO +13.2%.
Which is cheaper, FTGS or IVOO?
IVOO is cheaper, by 0.53 percentage points a year. That is about $53 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do FTGS and IVOO overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 94% of FTGS and 2% of IVOO by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, FTGS against IVOO, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ftgs-vs-ivoo

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.