Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
RSP vs XMHQ: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, RSP returned +16.0% to XMHQ's +12.8%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about RSP and XMHQ
Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $99.8bn for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF and $5.6bn for Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF.
Pair scorecard
RSP costs 0.05 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 3.2 points; RSP is 17.8 times larger.
| Measure | RSP | XMHQ |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +16.0% | +12.8% |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | S&P 500 Equal Weight Index | S&P MidCap 400 Quality Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.20% | 0.25% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 | $99.8bn | $5.6bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 2.7% | 30.7% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, RSP and XMHQ hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
RSP and XMHQ on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
RSP and XMHQ do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?
- What each follows. RSP follows S&P 500 Equal Weight Index and XMHQ follows S&P MidCap 400 Quality Index.
- Holdings in common. 0% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 RSP returned +16.0% and XMHQ +12.8% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 3.2 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
RSP
RSP tracks the S&P 500 equal weight. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +16.0% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.20% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 508 positions, with the top ten at 2.7%.
XMHQ
XMHQ tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +12.8% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 82 positions, with the top ten at 30.7%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, RSP or XMHQ?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, RSP returned +16.0% and XMHQ +12.8%.
- Which is cheaper, RSP or XMHQ?
- RSP is cheaper, by 0.05 percentage points a year. That is about $5 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, RSP against XMHQ, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/rsp-vs-xmhq
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). RSP against XMHQ. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/rsp-vs-xmhq
[RSP against XMHQ (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/rsp-vs-xmhq)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.