Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
FPX vs IMCG: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, FPX returned +2.9% to IMCG's +15.4%; 5% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about FPX and IMCG
Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $1.4bn for First Trust US Equity Opportunities ETF and $4.1bn for iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF.
Pair scorecard
IMCG costs 0.51 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 12.5 points; IMCG is 2.9 times larger.
| Measure | FPX | IMCG |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +2.9% | +15.4% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 15.9%, high on Jun 30, 2026 | 5.2%, high on Aug 13, 2026 |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | IPOX -100 U.S. Index | Morningstar US Mid Cap Broad Growth Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.57% | 0.06% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 | $1.4bn | $4.1bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 5% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 46.4% | 13.0% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, FPX and IMCG hold 5% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.
half
5% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
FPX and IMCG on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
FPX and IMCG do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?
- What each follows. FPX follows IPOX -100 U.S. Index and IMCG follows Morningstar US Mid Cap Broad Growth Index.
- Holdings in common. 5% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 FPX returned +2.9% and IMCG +15.4% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 12.5 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
FPX
FPX tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +2.9% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.57% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 51% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 99 positions, with the top ten at 46.4%. It sat 15.9% below its high of Jun 30, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
IMCG
IMCG tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +15.4% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 80% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 260 positions, with the top ten at 13.0%. It sat 5.2% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, FPX or IMCG?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FPX returned +2.9% and IMCG +15.4%.
- Which is cheaper, FPX or IMCG?
- IMCG is cheaper, by 0.51 percentage points a year. That is about $51 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, FPX against IMCG, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fpx-vs-imcg
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). FPX against IMCG. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fpx-vs-imcg
[FPX against IMCG (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fpx-vs-imcg)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.