Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

FNX vs NUSC: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, FNX returned +12.4% to NUSC's +12.2%; 21% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about FNX and NUSC

Net assets: $1.4bn on Oct 27, 2026 for First Trust Mid Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund, and $1.3bn on Jul 31, 2026 for Nuveen ESG Small-Cap ETF.

At a glance
+12.4%
FNX total return, 1 year
+12.2%
NUSC total return, 1 year
0.62%
FNX expense ratio
0.31%
NUSC expense ratio

Pair scorecard

NUSC costs 0.31 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.2 points.

FNX vs NUSC: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureFNXNUSC
Return
Total return, 1 year+12.4%+12.2%
Drawdown
Below its high4.9%, high on Aug 14, 20265.7%, high on Aug 14, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksNasdaq AlphaDEX Mid Cap Core IndexNuveen ESG USA Small-Cap Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.62%0.31%
Net assets, FNX as of Oct 27, 2026 and NUSC as of Jul 31, 2026$1.4bn$1.3bn
Holdings
Holdings in common21%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund4.4%10.2%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Dec 23, 2016 to Oct 23, 2026 · 513 weekly returns
FNX NUSC
Return
Total return edge FNX +171.6% +139.1%
Annualized edge FNX +10.7% +9.2%
Price return edge FNX +144.1% +100.1%
Risk
Volatility edge NUSC (slight) 22.1% 21.6%
Max drawdown edge NUSC (slight) −41.9% −40.5%
Downside capture 107.9% 103.0%
Beta 1.15 1.07
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge FNX 0.45 0.40
Sortino edge FNX 0.65 0.57
Treynor 0.086 0.081
Calmar edge FNX 0.25 0.23
Against the benchmark
Alpha −1.5% a year −4.5% a year
Alpha t-stat −0.77 −1.33
Information ratio −0.01 −0.34
Tracking error 9.1% 10.5%

Each against its own benchmark: FNX against IWV, May 18, 2007 to Oct 23, 2026; NUSC against MLRG, Dec 23, 2016 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

FNX returned more: +171.6% to +139.1%. NUSC swung slightly less: 21.6% to 22.1%. NUSC fell slightly less at its worst: −40.5% to −41.9%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: FNX vs NUSC: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureFNXNUSCEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+171.6%+139.1%FNXPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+10.7%+9.2%FNXTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+144.1%+100.1%FNXPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility22.1%21.6%NUSC (slight)Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation15.4%15.1%TieLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−41.9%−40.5%NUSC (slight)Deepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture115.8%93.6%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture107.9%103.0%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.151.07Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.850.77Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.450.40FNXReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.650.57FNXReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.0860.081Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.250.23FNXAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkIWVMLRGThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha−1.5% a year−4.5% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat−0.77−1.33Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−5.4% to +2.4%−11.0% to +2.1%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio−0.01−0.34Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error9.1%10.5%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 513 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

21%

By the books each fund has filed, FNX and NUSC hold 21% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

21% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first FNX NUSC
Axis Capital Holdings Limited 0.39% 0.55%
Glaukos Corporation 0.39% 0.47%
UGI Corporation 0.39% 0.58%
RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd. 0.38% 0.96%
Commercial Metals Company 0.37% 0.57%
Victoria's Secret & Co. 0.37% 0.38%
Spire Inc. 0.40% 0.35%
Ingredion Incorporated 0.35% 0.36%
Southwest Gas Holdings, Inc. 0.41% 0.35%
Abercrombie & Fitch Co. (Class A) 0.35% 0.33%
Darling Ingredients Inc. 0.33% 0.69%
Frontdoor, Inc. 0.33% 0.38%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in FNX
Range Resources Corporation 0.54%
Antero Resources Corporation 0.45%
APA Corporation 0.44%
CNX Resources Corporation 0.44%
Amentum Holdings, Inc. 0.43%
Qualys, Inc. 0.43%
Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc. 0.42%
Murphy Oil Corporation 0.42%
Only in NUSC
ATI Inc 1.26%
TD SYNNEX Corp 1.08%
Viatris Inc 1.07%
nVent Electric PLC 1.06%
East West Bancorp Inc 1.04%
Service Corp International 0.87%
Medpace Holdings Inc 0.75%
Lattice Semiconductor Corp 0.69%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

FNX First Trust Mid Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund NUSC Nuveen ESG Small-Cap ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index Tracks an index
Total return, 1 year +12.4% +12.2%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.3% (IWV) +13.6% (MLRG)
Gap to its benchmark −0.9 pts vs IWV −1.4 pts vs MLRG
Expense ratio 0.62% 0.31%
Already in the S&P 500 8.2% 6.1%
Holdings 451 405
Net assets, FNX as of Oct 27, 2026 and NUSC as of Jul 31, 2026 $1.4bn $1.3bn

FNX and NUSC on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-C1AE1F738C

FNX and NUSC are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. What each follows. FNX follows Nasdaq AlphaDEX Mid Cap Core Index and NUSC follows Nuveen ESG USA Small-Cap Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 21% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026).
  3. Cost. FNX charges 0.62% of assets a year and NUSC 0.31%, a gap of 0.31 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

FNX flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
FNX

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +12.4% with distributions reinvested, against +13.3% for its benchmark, the Russell 3000 Index.

FNX tracks an index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.62% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 8% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 451 positions, with the top ten at 4.4%. It sat 4.9% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

NUSC

NUSC tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +12.2% with distributions reinvested, against +13.6% for its benchmark, the MSCI USA Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.31% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 6% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 405 positions, with the top ten at 10.2%. It sat 5.7% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FNX or NUSC?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FNX returned +12.4% and NUSC +12.2%.
Which is cheaper, FNX or NUSC?
NUSC is cheaper, by 0.31 percentage points a year. That is about $31 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do FNX and NUSC overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 8% of FNX and 6% of NUSC by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, FNX against NUSC, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fnx-vs-nusc

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.