Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
FNX vs GSSC: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, FNX returned +12.4% to GSSC's +17.1%; 18% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about FNX and GSSC
Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $1.4bn for First Trust Mid Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund and $1.1bn for GS ActiveBeta U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF.
Pair scorecard
GSSC costs 0.42 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 4.7 points; FNX is 1.3 times larger.
| Measure | FNX | GSSC |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +12.4% | +17.1% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 4.9%, high on Aug 14, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Nasdaq AlphaDEX Mid Cap Core Index | Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Small Cap Equity Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.62% | 0.20% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 | $1.4bn | $1.1bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 18% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 4.4% | 3.5% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, FNX and GSSC hold 18% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.
half
18% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
FNX and GSSC on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
FNX and GSSC are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- What each follows. FNX follows Nasdaq AlphaDEX Mid Cap Core Index and GSSC follows Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Small Cap Equity Index.
- Holdings in common. 18% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 FNX returned +12.4% and GSSC +17.1% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 4.7 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +12.4% with distributions reinvested, against +13.3% for its benchmark, the Russell 3000 Index.
FNX tracks an index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.62% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 8% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 451 positions, with the top ten at 4.4%. It sat 4.9% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +17.1% with distributions reinvested, against +13.3% for its benchmark, the Russell 3000 Index.
GSSC tracks an index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.20% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,410 positions, with the top ten at 3.5%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, FNX or GSSC?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FNX returned +12.4% and GSSC +17.1%.
- Which is cheaper, FNX or GSSC?
- GSSC is cheaper, by 0.42 percentage points a year. That is about $42 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, FNX against GSSC, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fnx-vs-gssc
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). FNX against GSSC. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fnx-vs-gssc
[FNX against GSSC (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fnx-vs-gssc)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.