Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

FNX vs IWC: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, FNX returned +12.4% to IWC's +16.5%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about FNX and IWC

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $1.4bn for First Trust Mid Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund and $1.2bn for iShares Micro-Cap ETF.

At a glance
+12.4%
FNX total return, 1 year
+16.5%
IWC total return, 1 year
0.62%
FNX expense ratio
0.60%
IWC expense ratio

Pair scorecard

IWC costs 0.02 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 4.1 points; FNX is 1.2 times larger.

FNX vs IWC: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureFNXIWC
Return
Total return, 1 year+12.4%+16.5%
Drawdown
Below its high4.9%, high on Aug 14, 20269.5%, high on Aug 14, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksNasdaq AlphaDEX Mid Cap Core IndexRussell Microcap Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.62%0.60%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$1.4bn$1.2bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund4.4%5.9%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

May 18, 2007 to Oct 23, 2026 · 1,014 weekly returns · each against IWV
FNX IWC
Return
Total return edge FNX +455.7% +271.4%
Annualized edge FNX +9.2% +7.0%
Price return edge FNX +360.2% +196.3%
Risk
Volatility edge FNX (slight) 22.8% 24.4%
Max drawdown edge FNX −57.0% −63.8%
Downside capture 107.9% 111.1%
Beta 1.15 1.16
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge FNX 0.43 0.34
Sortino edge FNX 0.61 0.48
Treynor 0.086 0.071
Calmar edge FNX 0.16 0.11
Against the benchmark
Alpha −1.5% a year −3.3% a year
Alpha t-stat −0.77 −1.23
Information ratio −0.01 −0.14
Tracking error 9.1% 12.3%
Reading

FNX returned more: +455.7% to +271.4%. FNX swung slightly less: 22.8% to 24.4%. FNX fell less at its worst: −57.0% to −63.8%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: FNX vs IWC: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureFNXIWCIWVEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+455.7%+271.4%FNXPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+9.2%+7.0%FNXTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+360.2%+196.3%FNXPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility22.8%24.4%FNX (slight)Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation16.2%17.2%FNX (slight)Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−57.0%−63.8%FNXDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture115.8%118.2%100.0%IWC (slight)Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture107.9%111.1%100.0%FNX (slight)Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.151.161.00TieHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.850.761.00Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.430.34FNXReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.610.48FNXReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.0860.0710.099FNXReturn above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.160.11FNXAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkIWVIWVIWVThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha−1.5% a year−3.3% a year0.0%Not significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat−0.77−1.23Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−5.4% to +2.4%−8.7% to +2.0%Both include zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio−0.01−0.14FNXReturn against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error9.1%12.3%0.0%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 1,014 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, FNX and IWC hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first FNX IWC
Only in one fund ↓
Only in FNX
Range Resources Corporation 0.54%
Antero Resources Corporation 0.45%
APA Corporation 0.44%
CNX Resources Corporation 0.44%
EPAM Systems, Inc. 0.44%
Amentum Holdings, Inc. 0.43%
Genpact Limited 0.43%
Qualys, Inc. 0.43%
Only in IWC
CAREDX 0.88%
PENGUIN SOLUTIONS INC 0.73%
NURIX THERAPEUTICS 0.63%
SELLAS LIFE SCIENCES GROUP INC 0.60%
VIRIDIAN THERAPEUTICS ORS 0.59%
OUSTER 0.53%
INTERFACE 0.52%
STRIVE INC CLASS A 0.50%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

FNX First Trust Mid Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund IWC iShares Micro-Cap ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index Tracks the Russell Microcap
Total return, 1 year +12.4% +16.5%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.3% (IWV) +13.3% (IWV)
Gap to its benchmark −0.9 pts vs IWV +3.2 pts vs IWV
Expense ratio 0.62% 0.60%
Already in the S&P 500 8.2% 91.7%
Holdings 451 1365
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $1.4bn $1.2bn

FNX and IWC on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-619D5E533A

FNX and IWC are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. What each follows. FNX follows Nasdaq AlphaDEX Mid Cap Core Index and IWC follows Russell Microcap Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 0% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 FNX returned +12.4% and IWC +16.5% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 4.1 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

FNX and IWC flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
FNX

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +12.4% with distributions reinvested, against +13.3% for its benchmark, the Russell 3000 Index.

FNX tracks an index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.62% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 8% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 451 positions, with the top ten at 4.4%. It sat 4.9% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

IWC

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +16.5% with distributions reinvested, against +13.3% for its benchmark, the Russell 3000 Index.

IWC tracks the Russell Microcap. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.60% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,365 positions, with the top ten at 5.9%. It sat 9.5% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FNX or IWC?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FNX returned +12.4% and IWC +16.5%.
Which is cheaper, FNX or IWC?
IWC is cheaper, by 0.02 percentage points a year. That is about $2 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do FNX and IWC overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 8% of FNX and 92% of IWC by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, FNX against IWC, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fnx-vs-iwc

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.