Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

IWC vs NUSC: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, IWC returned +16.5% to NUSC's +12.2%; 2% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about IWC and NUSC

Net assets: $1.2bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares Micro-Cap ETF, and $1.3bn on Jul 31, 2026 for Nuveen ESG Small-Cap ETF.

At a glance
+16.5%
IWC total return, 1 year
+12.2%
NUSC total return, 1 year
0.60%
IWC expense ratio
0.31%
NUSC expense ratio

Pair scorecard

NUSC costs 0.29 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 4.3 points.

IWC vs NUSC: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureIWCNUSC
Return
Total return, 1 year+16.5%+12.2%
Drawdown
Below its high9.5%, high on Aug 14, 20265.7%, high on Aug 14, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksRussell Microcap IndexNuveen ESG USA Small-Cap Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.60%0.31%
Net assets, IWC as of Oct 27, 2026 and NUSC as of Jul 31, 2026$1.2bn$1.3bn
Holdings
Holdings in common2%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund5.9%10.2%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Dec 23, 2016 to Oct 23, 2026 · 513 weekly returns
IWC NUSC
Return
Total return edge NUSC (slight) +127.1% +139.1%
Annualized edge NUSC (slight) +8.7% +9.2%
Price return edge IWC (slight) +103.8% +100.1%
Risk
Volatility edge NUSC 24.3% 21.6%
Max drawdown edge NUSC −45.2% −40.5%
Downside capture 111.7% 103.0%
Beta 1.16 1.07
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge NUSC 0.36 0.40
Sortino edge NUSC (slight) 0.52 0.57
Treynor 0.070 0.081
Calmar edge NUSC 0.19 0.23
Against the benchmark
Alpha −3.6% a year −4.5% a year
Alpha t-stat −1.41 −1.33
Information ratio −0.16 −0.34
Tracking error 12.0% 10.5%

Each against its own benchmark: IWC against IWV, Aug 26, 2005 to Oct 23, 2026; NUSC against MLRG, Dec 23, 2016 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

NUSC returned slightly more: +139.1% to +127.1%. NUSC swung less: 21.6% to 24.3%. NUSC fell less at its worst: −40.5% to −45.2%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: IWC vs NUSC: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureIWCNUSCEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+127.1%+139.1%NUSC (slight)Price change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+8.7%+9.2%NUSC (slight)Total return as a yearly rate.
Price return+103.8%+100.1%IWC (slight)Price change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility24.3%21.6%NUSCSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation16.9%15.1%NUSCLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−45.2%−40.5%NUSCDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture118.0%93.6%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture111.7%103.0%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.161.07Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.760.77Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.360.40NUSCReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.520.57NUSC (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.0700.081Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.190.23NUSCAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkIWVMLRGThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha−3.6% a year−4.5% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat−1.41−1.33Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−8.5% to +1.4%−11.0% to +2.1%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio−0.16−0.34Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error12.0%10.5%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 513 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

2%

By the books each fund has filed, IWC and NUSC hold 2% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

2% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first IWC NUSC
INTERFACE 0.52% 0.15%
CAREDX 0.88% 0.14%
NUVATION BIO CLASS A 0.28% 0.12%
MBX BIOSCIENCES 0.40% 0.11%
BUTTERFLY NETWORK CLASS A 0.40% 0.10%
USA TODAY INC 0.22% 0.09%
THE REALREAL 0.30% 0.09%
COLLEGIUM PHARMACEUTICAL 0.18% 0.09%
RAPPORT THERAPEUTICS 0.21% 0.09%
GREEN PLAINS 0.23% 0.08%
WILLDAN GROUP 0.27% 0.08%
NPK INTERNATIONAL 0.23% 0.07%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in IWC
PENGUIN SOLUTIONS INC 0.73%
NURIX THERAPEUTICS 0.63%
SELLAS LIFE SCIENCES GROUP INC 0.60%
VIRIDIAN THERAPEUTICS ORS 0.59%
OUSTER 0.53%
STRIVE INC CLASS A 0.50%
HYPERLIQUID STRATEGIES INC 0.46%
PORCH GROUP 0.44%
Only in NUSC
ATI Inc 1.26%
TD SYNNEX Corp 1.08%
Host Hotels & Resorts Inc 1.07%
Viatris Inc 1.07%
nVent Electric PLC 1.06%
East West Bancorp Inc 1.04%
RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd 0.96%
AGNC Investment Corp 0.90%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

IWC iShares Micro-Cap ETF NUSC Nuveen ESG Small-Cap ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks the Russell Microcap Tracks an index
Total return, 1 year +16.5% +12.2%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.3% (IWV) +13.6% (MLRG)
Gap to its benchmark +3.2 pts vs IWV −1.4 pts vs MLRG
Expense ratio 0.60% 0.31%
Already in the S&P 500 91.7% 6.1%
Holdings 1365 405
Net assets, IWC as of Oct 27, 2026 and NUSC as of Jul 31, 2026 $1.2bn $1.3bn

IWC and NUSC on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-FCC80C96C1

IWC and NUSC are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. What each follows. IWC follows Russell Microcap Index and NUSC follows Nuveen ESG USA Small-Cap Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 2% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 IWC returned +16.5% and NUSC +12.2% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 4.3 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

IWC flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
IWC

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +16.5% with distributions reinvested, against +13.3% for its benchmark, the Russell 3000 Index.

IWC tracks the Russell Microcap. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.60% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,365 positions, with the top ten at 5.9%. It sat 9.5% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

NUSC

NUSC tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +12.2% with distributions reinvested, against +13.6% for its benchmark, the MSCI USA Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.31% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 6% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 405 positions, with the top ten at 10.2%. It sat 5.7% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IWC or NUSC?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWC returned +16.5% and NUSC +12.2%.
Which is cheaper, IWC or NUSC?
NUSC is cheaper, by 0.29 percentage points a year. That is about $29 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IWC and NUSC overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 92% of IWC and 6% of NUSC by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, IWC against NUSC, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwc-vs-nusc

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.