Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

NUSC vs PSC: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, NUSC returned +12.2% to PSC's +21.0%; 20% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about NUSC and PSC

Net assets: $1.3bn on Jul 31, 2026 for Nuveen ESG Small-Cap ETF, and $2.7bn on Oct 26, 2026 for Principal U.S. Small-Cap ETF.

At a glance
+12.2%
NUSC total return, 1 year
+21.0%
PSC total return, 1 year
0.31%
NUSC expense ratio
0.38%
PSC expense ratio

Pair scorecard

NUSC costs 0.07 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 8.8 points.

NUSC vs PSC: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureNUSCPSC
Return
Total return, 1 year+12.2%+21.0%
Drawdown
Below its high5.7%, high on Aug 14, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksNuveen ESG USA Small-Cap IndexNo index, actively managed
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.31%0.38%
Net assets, NUSC as of Jul 31, 2026 and PSC as of Oct 26, 2026$1.3bn$2.7bn
Holdings
Holdings in common20%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund10.2%11.2%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Dec 23, 2016 to Oct 23, 2026 · 513 weekly returns
NUSC PSC
Return
Total return edge PSC +139.1% +173.9%
Annualized edge PSC +9.2% +10.8%
Price return edge PSC +100.1% +143.2%
Risk
Volatility edge NUSC (slight) 21.6% 23.1%
Max drawdown edge NUSC (slight) −40.5% −44.9%
Downside capture 103.0% 91.9%
Beta 1.07 0.95
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge PSC 0.40 0.45
Sortino edge PSC 0.57 0.65
Treynor 0.081 0.118
Calmar edge PSC (slight) 0.23 0.24
Against the benchmark
Alpha −4.5% a year +2.4% a year
Alpha t-stat −1.33 0.96
Information ratio −0.34 0.24
Tracking error 10.5% 8.1%

Each against its own benchmark: NUSC against MLRG, Dec 23, 2016 to Oct 23, 2026; PSC against IWM, Sep 30, 2016 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

PSC returned more: +173.9% to +139.1%. NUSC swung slightly less: 21.6% to 23.1%. NUSC fell slightly less at its worst: −40.5% to −44.9%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: NUSC vs PSC: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureNUSCPSCEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+139.1%+173.9%PSCPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+9.2%+10.8%PSCTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+100.1%+143.2%PSCPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility21.6%23.1%NUSC (slight)Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation15.1%16.0%NUSC (slight)Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−40.5%−44.9%NUSC (slight)Deepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture93.6%84.9%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture103.0%91.9%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.070.95Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.770.88Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.400.45PSCReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.570.65PSCReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.0810.118Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.230.24PSC (slight)Annualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkMLRGIWMThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha−4.5% a year+2.4% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat−1.330.96Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−11.0% to +2.1%−2.5% to +7.4%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio−0.340.24Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error10.5%8.1%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 513 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

20%

By the books each fund has filed, NUSC and PSC hold 20% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

20% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first NUSC PSC
Sterling Infrastructure Inc 0.80% 1.17%
TTM Technologies Inc 0.68% 1.03%
Rambus Inc 0.67% 0.79%
Nextpower Inc 0.69% 0.63%
Advanced Energy Industries Inc 0.82% 0.62%
SPX Technologies Inc 0.61% 0.53%
HealthEquity Inc 0.48% 0.47%
Moog Inc 0.62% 0.46%
Powell Industries Inc 0.46% 0.75%
Ormat Technologies Inc 0.45% 0.45%
Hims & Hers Health Inc 0.41% 1.31%
Alkermes PLC 0.58% 0.38%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in NUSC
ATI Inc 1.26%
TD SYNNEX Corp 1.08%
Host Hotels & Resorts Inc 1.07%
Viatris Inc 1.07%
nVent Electric PLC 1.06%
East West Bancorp Inc 1.04%
RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd 0.96%
AGNC Investment Corp 0.90%
Only in PSC
Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd 1.38%
Sezzle Inc 1.30%
DigitalOcean Holdings Inc 1.19%
Vicor Corp 1.05%
Argan Inc 1.03%
Bread Financial Holdings Inc 0.92%
Planet Labs PBC 0.84%
Zeta Global Holdings Corp 0.78%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

NUSC Nuveen ESG Small-Cap ETF PSC Principal U.S. Small-Cap ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index Actively managed
Total return, 1 year +12.2% +21.0%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.6% (MLRG) +14.1% (IWM)
Gap to its benchmark −1.4 pts vs MLRG +6.9 pts vs IWM
Expense ratio 0.31% 0.38%
Already in the S&P 500 6.1% 0.0%
Holdings 405 506
Net assets, NUSC as of Jul 31, 2026 and PSC as of Oct 26, 2026 $1.3bn $2.7bn

NUSC and PSC on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-2A45344047

NUSC and PSC are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. What each follows. NUSC follows Nuveen ESG USA Small-Cap Index and PSC follows No index, actively managed.
  2. Holdings in common. 20% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 NUSC returned +12.2% and PSC +21.0% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 8.8 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

PSC flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
NUSC

NUSC tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +12.2% with distributions reinvested, against +13.6% for its benchmark, the MSCI USA Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.31% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 6% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 405 positions, with the top ten at 10.2%. It sat 5.7% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

PSC

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +21.0% with distributions reinvested, against +14.1% for its benchmark, the Russell 2000 Index.

PSC is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.38% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 506 positions, with the top ten at 11.2%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, NUSC or PSC?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, NUSC returned +12.2% and PSC +21.0%.
Which is cheaper, NUSC or PSC?
NUSC is cheaper, by 0.07 percentage points a year. That is about $7 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do NUSC and PSC overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 6% of NUSC and 0% of PSC by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, NUSC against PSC, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/nusc-vs-psc

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.