Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
GSSC vs IWC: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, GSSC returned +17.1% to IWC's +16.5%; 24% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about GSSC and IWC
Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $1.1bn for GS ActiveBeta U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF and $1.2bn for iShares Micro-Cap ETF.
Pair scorecard
GSSC costs 0.40 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.6 points; IWC is 1.1 times larger.
| Measure | GSSC | IWC |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +17.1% | +16.5% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 4.9%, high on Aug 14, 2026 | 9.5%, high on Aug 14, 2026 |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Small Cap Equity Index | Russell Microcap Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.20% | 0.60% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 | $1.1bn | $1.2bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 24% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 3.5% | 5.9% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, GSSC and IWC hold 24% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.
half
24% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
GSSC and IWC on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
GSSC and IWC are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- What each follows. GSSC follows Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Small Cap Equity Index and IWC follows Russell Microcap Index.
- Holdings in common. 24% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026).
- Cost. GSSC charges 0.20% of assets a year and IWC 0.60%, a gap of 0.40 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +17.1% with distributions reinvested, against +13.3% for its benchmark, the Russell 3000 Index.
GSSC tracks an index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.20% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,410 positions, with the top ten at 3.5%. It sat 4.9% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +16.5% with distributions reinvested, against +13.3% for its benchmark, the Russell 3000 Index.
IWC tracks the Russell Microcap. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.60% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,365 positions, with the top ten at 5.9%. It sat 9.5% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, GSSC or IWC?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, GSSC returned +17.1% and IWC +16.5%.
- Which is cheaper, GSSC or IWC?
- GSSC is cheaper, by 0.40 percentage points a year. That is about $40 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, GSSC against IWC, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/gssc-vs-iwc
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). GSSC against IWC. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/gssc-vs-iwc
[GSSC against IWC (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/gssc-vs-iwc)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.