Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
FNDX vs ILF: how they differ
FNDX and ILF hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and ILF returned more over the year.
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF and iShares Latin America 40 ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, FNDX and ILF hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in FNDX | Only in ILF |
|---|---|
| Apple Inc 4.64% | NU HOLDINGS CLASS A 8.61% |
| Intel Corp 2.57% | VALE ADR REPRESENTING ONE 8.00% |
| Alphabet Inc 2.38% | ITAU UNIBANCO HOLDING ADR REP PRE 6.71% |
| Microsoft Corp 2.33% | PETROLEO BRASILEIRO ADR REPTG PRE 6.33% |
| Exxon Mobil Corp 2.29% | GRUPO MEXICO B 6.02% |
| Alphabet Inc 1.90% | PETROLEO BRASILEIRO ADR REPTG SA 5.94% |
| Amazon.com Inc 1.86% | GPO FINANCE BANORTE 4.24% |
| Micron Technology Inc 1.60% | CREDICORP LTD 3.85% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Sep 10, 2026.
| FNDX Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF | ILF iShares Latin America 40 ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Schwab | iShares |
| What it is | Fundamental U.S. Large Company | Latin America 40 |
| Total return, 1 year | +26.1% | +33.4% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +8.6 pts | +15.9 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.25% | 0.47% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 91.2% | 0.0% |
| Holdings | 733 | 47 |
FNDX in plain words
FNDX is an index equity fund tracking the Fundamental U.S. Large Company. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +26.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 91% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 733 positions, with the top ten at 22.5%.
ILF in plain words
ILF is an index equity fund tracking the Latin America 40. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +33.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.47% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 47 positions, with the top ten at 55.7%. It sat 4.4% below its high of Apr 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, FNDX or ILF?
- In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FNDX returned +26.1% and ILF returned +33.4%, so ILF returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, FNDX or ILF?
- FNDX charges 0.25% a year and ILF charges 0.47%, so FNDX is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do FNDX and ILF overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 91% of FNDX and 0% of ILF by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, FNDX against ILF, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fndx-vs-ilf Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources