Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
FNDX vs ILF: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, FNDX returned +23.9% to ILF's +17.2%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about FNDX and ILFNet assets: $27.6bn on Aug 31, 2026 for Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF, and $3.5bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares Latin America 40 ETF.
Pair scorecard
FNDX costs 0.22 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 6.7 points.
| Measure | FNDX | ILF |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +23.9% | +17.2% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 13.7%, high on Oct 12, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Fundamental U.S. Large Company | S&P Latin America 40 |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.25% | 0.47% |
| Net assets, FNDX as of Aug 31, 2026 and ILF as of Oct 28, 2026 | $27.6bn | $3.5bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 21.0% | 55.6% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, FNDX and ILF hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
FNDX and ILF on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +23.9% with distributions reinvested, against +13.1% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Index.
FNDX tracks an index of Fundamental U.S. Large Company. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 88% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 731 positions, with the top ten at 21.0%.
ILF
ILF tracks an index of Latin America 40. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +17.2% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.47% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 46 positions, with the top ten at 55.6%. It sat 13.7% below its high of Oct 12, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, FNDX or ILF?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FNDX returned +23.9% and ILF +17.2%.
- Which is cheaper, FNDX or ILF?
- FNDX is cheaper, by 0.22 percentage points a year. That is about $22 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, FNDX against ILF, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fndx-vs-ilf
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). FNDX against ILF. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fndx-vs-ilf
[FNDX against ILF (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fndx-vs-ilf)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.