Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

FNDX vs IEFA: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, FNDX returned +23.9% to IEFA's +12.3%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about FNDX and IEFA

Net assets: $27.6bn on Aug 31, 2026 for Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF, and $190.4bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF.

At a glance
+23.9%
FNDX total return, 1 year
+12.3%
IEFA total return, 1 year
0.25%
FNDX expense ratio
0.07%
IEFA expense ratio

Pair scorecard

IEFA costs 0.18 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 11.6 points.

FNDX vs IEFA: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureFNDXIEFA
Return
Total return, 1 year+23.9%+12.3%
Drawdown
Below its high4.7%, high on Aug 25, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksFundamental U.S. Large CompanyMSCI EAFE IMI Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.25%0.07%
Net assets, FNDX as of Aug 31, 2026 and IEFA as of Oct 28, 2026$27.6bn$190.4bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund21.0%12.3%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Aug 23, 2013 to Oct 23, 2026 · 687 weekly returns
FNDX IEFA
Return
Total return edge FNDX +418.7% +153.1%
Annualized edge FNDX +13.3% +7.3%
Price return edge FNDX +298.9% +72.5%
Risk
Volatility edge FNDX (slight) 15.9% 16.4%
Max drawdown edge IEFA (slight) −35.2% −34.1%
Downside capture 92.1% 97.7%
Beta 0.93 1.00
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge FNDX 0.74 0.39
Sortino edge FNDX 1.05 0.55
Treynor 0.128 0.073
Calmar edge FNDX 0.38 0.21
Against the benchmark
Alpha +0.4% a year +0.8% a year
Alpha t-stat 0.28 0.96
Information ratio −0.10 0.25
Tracking error 5.3% 3.2%

Each against its own benchmark: FNDX against IWB, Aug 23, 2013 to Oct 23, 2026; IEFA against ACWX, Nov 2, 2012 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

FNDX returned more: +418.7% to +153.1%. FNDX swung slightly less: 15.9% to 16.4%. IEFA fell slightly less at its worst: −34.1% to −35.2%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: FNDX vs IEFA: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureFNDXIEFAEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+418.7%+153.1%FNDXPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+13.3%+7.3%FNDXTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+298.9%+72.5%FNDXPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility15.9%16.4%FNDX (slight)Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation11.2%11.7%FNDX (slight)Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−35.2%−34.1%IEFA (slight)Deepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture86.4%98.1%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture92.1%97.7%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta0.931.00Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.900.96Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.740.39FNDXReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino1.050.55FNDXReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1280.073Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.380.21FNDXAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkIWBACWXThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha+0.4% a year+0.8% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat0.280.96Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−2.4% to +3.2%−0.9% to +2.5%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio−0.100.25Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error5.3%3.2%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 687 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, FNDX and IEFA hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first FNDX IEFA
Merck & Co Inc 0.79% 0.08%
EQT Corp 0.06% 0.05%
AerCap Holdings NV 0.03% 0.10%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in FNDX
Apple Inc 4.46%
Microsoft Corp 2.82%
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp 2.42%
Amazon.com Inc 1.80%
Alphabet Inc 1.78%
JPMorgan Chase & Co 1.63%
Chevron Corp 1.61%
Berkshire Hathaway Inc 1.60%
Only in IEFA
ASML HOLDING 2.55%
ROCHE PS PAR AG 1.36%
SHELL 1.21%
HSBC HOLDINGS PLC 1.18%
NOVARTIS AG 1.14%
ASTRAZENECA PLC 1.04%
NESTLE SA 1.04%
SAP 0.97%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

FNDX Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF IEFA iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index of Fundamental U.S. Large Company Tracks the MSCI EAFE
Total return, 1 year +23.9% +12.3%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.1% (IWB) +14.3% (ACWX)
Gap to its benchmark +10.8 pts vs IWB −2.0 pts vs ACWX
Expense ratio 0.25% 0.07%
Already in the S&P 500 88.4% 0.0%
Holdings 731 2629
Net assets, FNDX as of Aug 31, 2026 and IEFA as of Oct 28, 2026 $27.6bn $190.4bn

FNDX and IEFA on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-1F164FF79C

FNDX and IEFA do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

  1. What each follows. FNDX follows Fundamental U.S. Large Company and IEFA follows MSCI EAFE IMI Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 0% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 FNDX returned +23.9% and IEFA +12.3% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 11.6 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

IEFA flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
FNDX

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +23.9% with distributions reinvested, against +13.1% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Index.

FNDX tracks an index of Fundamental U.S. Large Company. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 88% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 731 positions, with the top ten at 21.0%.

IEFA

IEFA tracks the MSCI EAFE. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +12.3% with distributions reinvested, against +14.3% for its benchmark, the MSCI ACWI ex USA Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2,629 positions, with the top ten at 12.3%. It sat 4.7% below its high of Aug 25, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FNDX or IEFA?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FNDX returned +23.9% and IEFA +12.3%.
Which is cheaper, FNDX or IEFA?
IEFA is cheaper, by 0.18 percentage points a year. That is about $18 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do FNDX and IEFA overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 88% of FNDX and 0% of IEFA by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, FNDX against IEFA, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fndx-vs-iefa

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.