Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
FNDX vs VT: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, FNDX returned +23.9% to VT's +13.5%; 46% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about FNDX and VT
Net assets: $27.6bn on Aug 31, 2026 for Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF, and $81.8bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Total World Stock Index ETF.
Pair scorecard
VT costs 0.19 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 10.4 points.
| Measure | FNDX | VT |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +23.9% | +13.5% |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Fundamental U.S. Large Company | FTSE Global All Cap Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.25% | 0.06% |
| Net assets, FNDX as of Aug 31, 2026 and VT as of Sep 30, 2026 | $27.6bn | $81.8bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 46% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 21.0% | 22.5% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026. Method
Risk and return
Aug 23, 2013 to Oct 23, 2026 · 687 weekly returnsFNDX returned more: +418.7% to +282.1%. FNDX and VT swung about the same: 15.9% and 15.7%. VT fell slightly less at its worst: −32.6% to −35.2%.
Full scorecard
9 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | FNDX | VT | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +418.7% | +282.1% | FNDX | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +13.3% | +10.7% | FNDX | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | +298.9% | +187.6% | FNDX | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 15.9% | 15.7% | Tie | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 11.2% | 11.0% | Tie | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −35.2% | −32.6% | VT (slight) | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | 0.74 | 0.60 | FNDX | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 1.05 | 0.86 | FNDX | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Calmar | 0.38 | 0.33 | FNDX | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 687 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, FNDX and VT hold 46% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026.
half
46% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
FNDX and VT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
FNDX and VT do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?
- What each follows. FNDX follows Fundamental U.S. Large Company and VT follows FTSE Global All Cap Index.
- Holdings in common. 46% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 FNDX returned +23.9% and VT +13.5% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 10.4 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +23.9% with distributions reinvested, against +13.1% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Index.
FNDX tracks an index of Fundamental U.S. Large Company. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 88% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 731 positions, with the top ten at 21.0%.
VT
VT tracks an index of Total World Stock. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +13.5% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 55% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 10,194 positions, with the top ten at 22.5%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, FNDX or VT?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FNDX returned +23.9% and VT +13.5%.
- Which is cheaper, FNDX or VT?
- VT is cheaper, by 0.19 percentage points a year. That is about $19 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, FNDX against VT, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fndx-vs-vt
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). FNDX against VT. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fndx-vs-vt
[FNDX against VT (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fndx-vs-vt)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.