Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

FNDA vs GSSC: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, FNDA returned +16.4% to GSSC's +17.1%; 36% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about FNDA and GSSC

Net assets: $9.1bn on Aug 31, 2026 for Schwab Fundamental U.S. Small Company ETF, and $1.1bn on Oct 27, 2026 for GS ActiveBeta U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF.

At a glance
+16.4%
FNDA total return, 1 year
+17.1%
GSSC total return, 1 year
0.25%
FNDA expense ratio
0.20%
GSSC expense ratio

Pair scorecard

GSSC costs 0.05 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.7 points.

FNDA vs GSSC: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureFNDAGSSC
Return
Total return, 1 year+16.4%+17.1%
Drawdown
Below its high6.3%, high on Aug 14, 20264.9%, high on Aug 14, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksnot read by ETFIQGoldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Small Cap Equity Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.25%0.20%
Net assets, FNDA as of Aug 31, 2026 and GSSC as of Oct 27, 2026$9.1bn$1.1bn
Holdings
Holdings in common36%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund3.8%3.5%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Jul 7, 2017 to Oct 23, 2026 · 485 weekly returns
FNDA GSSC
Return
Total return edge GSSC (slight) +134.8% +141.5%
Annualized edge GSSC (slight) +9.6% +9.9%
Price return edge GSSC (slight) +106.1% +115.0%
Risk
Volatility edge Tie 22.9% 22.7%
Max drawdown edge GSSC (slight) −43.0% −41.0%
Downside capture 106.7% 106.0%
Beta 1.11 1.10
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge GSSC (slight) 0.40 0.41
Sortino edge GSSC (slight) 0.57 0.60
Treynor 0.087 0.086
Calmar edge GSSC (slight) 0.22 0.24
Against the benchmark
Alpha −4.4% a year −4.0% a year
Alpha t-stat −1.48 −1.08
Information ratio −0.28 −0.25
Tracking error 10.8% 11.3%

Each against its own benchmark: FNDA against VOO, Aug 23, 2013 to Oct 23, 2026; GSSC against IWV, Jul 7, 2017 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

GSSC returned slightly more: +141.5% to +134.8%. FNDA and GSSC swung about the same: 22.9% and 22.7%. GSSC fell slightly less at its worst: −41.0% to −43.0%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: FNDA vs GSSC: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureFNDAGSSCEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+134.8%+141.5%GSSC (slight)Price change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+9.6%+9.9%GSSC (slight)Total return as a yearly rate.
Price return+106.1%+115.0%GSSC (slight)Price change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility22.9%22.7%TieSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation16.1%15.8%TieLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−43.0%−41.0%GSSC (slight)Deepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture99.9%101.1%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture106.7%106.0%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.111.10Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.730.76Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.400.41GSSC (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.570.60GSSC (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.0870.086Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.220.24GSSC (slight)Annualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkVOOIWVThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha−4.4% a year−4.0% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat−1.48−1.08Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−10.2% to +1.4%−11.2% to +3.2%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio−0.28−0.25Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error10.8%11.3%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 485 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

36%

By the books each fund has filed, FNDA and GSSC hold 36% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

36% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first FNDA GSSC
Abercrombie & Fitch Co 0.36% 0.26%
Victoria's Secret & Co 0.46% 0.26%
Viasat Inc 0.30% 0.24%
EnerSys 0.27% 0.24%
Compass Inc 0.42% 0.23%
Moog Inc 0.25% 0.22%
Enova International Inc 0.22% 0.37%
Terex Corp 0.31% 0.20%
Valley National Bancorp 0.22% 0.20%
Par Pacific Holdings Inc 0.35% 0.19%
Plexus Corp 0.23% 0.19%
Moelis & Co 0.19% 0.19%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in FNDA
Lumentum Holdings Inc 0.55%
Twilio Inc 0.34%
MKS Inc 0.32%
Royalty Pharma PLC 0.32%
Coherent Corp 0.32%
ATI Inc 0.31%
FactSet Research Systems Inc 0.31%
Southern Copper Corp 0.30%
Only in GSSC
10X GENOMICS INC 0.49%
CAREDX INC 0.41%
TRAVERE THERAPEUTICS INC 0.38%
ZETA GLOBAL HOLDINGS CORP 0.31%
DAVE INC 0.30%
STONEX GROUP INC 0.29%
ACADIA PHARMACEUTICALS INC 0.28%
APPIAN CORP 0.27%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

FNDA Schwab Fundamental U.S. Small Company ETF GSSC GS ActiveBeta U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index Tracks an index
Total return, 1 year +16.4% +17.1%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.7% (VOO) +13.3% (IWV)
Gap to its benchmark +2.7 pts vs VOO +3.8 pts vs IWV
Expense ratio 0.25% 0.20%
Already in the S&P 500 6.6% 0.0%
Holdings 913 1410
Net assets, FNDA as of Aug 31, 2026 and GSSC as of Oct 27, 2026 $9.1bn $1.1bn

FNDA and GSSC on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-999D418F6C

FNDA and GSSC are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. Holdings in common. 36% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Aug 31, 2026).
  2. One-year total return (similar). Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 FNDA returned +16.4% and GSSC +17.1% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 0.7 points.
  3. Number of holdings (similar). FNDA holds 913 positions and GSSC holds 1410.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

The week's ETF fund flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
FNDA

FNDA tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +16.4% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 7% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 913 positions, with the top ten at 3.8%. It sat 6.3% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

GSSC

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +17.1% with distributions reinvested, against +13.3% for its benchmark, the Russell 3000 Index.

GSSC tracks an index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.20% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,410 positions, with the top ten at 3.5%. It sat 4.9% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FNDA or GSSC?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FNDA returned +16.4% and GSSC +17.1%.
Which is cheaper, FNDA or GSSC?
GSSC is cheaper, by 0.05 percentage points a year. That is about $5 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do FNDA and GSSC overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 7% of FNDA and 0% of GSSC by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, FNDA against GSSC, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fnda-vs-gssc

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.