Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
GSSC vs VB: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, GSSC returned +17.1% to VB's +14.4%; 22% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about GSSC and VB
Net assets: $1.1bn on Oct 27, 2026 for GS ActiveBeta U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF, and $76.9bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Morningstar Small-Cap ETF.
Pair scorecard
VB costs 0.17 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 2.7 points.
| Measure | GSSC | VB |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +17.1% | +14.4% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 4.9%, high on Aug 14, 2026 | 5.7%, high on Aug 14, 2026 |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Small Cap Equity Index | Morningstar US Small Cap Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.20% | 0.03% |
| Net assets, GSSC as of Oct 27, 2026 and VB as of Sep 30, 2026 | $1.1bn | $76.9bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 22% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 3.5% | 5.9% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, GSSC and VB hold 22% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026.
half
22% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
GSSC and VB on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
GSSC and VB are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- What each follows. GSSC follows Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Small Cap Equity Index and VB follows Morningstar US Small Cap Index.
- Holdings in common. 22% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 GSSC returned +17.1% and VB +14.4% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 2.7 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +17.1% with distributions reinvested, against +13.3% for its benchmark, the Russell 3000 Index.
GSSC tracks an index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.20% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,410 positions, with the top ten at 3.5%. It sat 4.9% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
VB
VB tracks an index of Small-Cap. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +14.4% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 22% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,303 positions, with the top ten at 5.9%. It sat 5.7% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, GSSC or VB?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, GSSC returned +17.1% and VB +14.4%.
- Which is cheaper, GSSC or VB?
- VB is cheaper, by 0.17 percentage points a year. That is about $17 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, GSSC against VB, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/gssc-vs-vb
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). GSSC against VB. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/gssc-vs-vb
[GSSC against VB (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/gssc-vs-vb)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.