Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
GSSC vs IWM: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, GSSC returned +17.1% to IWM's +14.1%; 65% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about GSSC and IWM
Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $1.1bn for GS ActiveBeta U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF and $75.5bn for iShares Russell 2000 ETF.
Pair scorecard
IWM costs 0.01 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 3.0 points; IWM is far larger, $75.5bn against $1.1bn.
| Measure | GSSC | IWM |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +17.1% | +14.1% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 4.9%, high on Aug 14, 2026 | 7.6%, high on Aug 14, 2026 |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Small Cap Equity Index | Russell 2000 Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.20% | 0.19% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 | $1.1bn | $75.5bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 65% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 3.5% | 3.3% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, GSSC and IWM hold 65% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.
half
65% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
GSSC and IWM on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
GSSC and IWM are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- What each follows. GSSC follows Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Small Cap Equity Index and IWM follows Russell 2000 Index.
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 GSSC returned +17.1% and IWM +14.1% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 3.0 points.
- Size. GSSC has $1.1bn in net assets and IWM $75.5bn (net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026); IWM is 68.6 times larger.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +17.1% with distributions reinvested, against +13.3% for its benchmark, the Russell 3000 Index.
GSSC tracks an index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.20% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,410 positions, with the top ten at 3.5%. It sat 4.9% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
IWM
IWM tracks the Russell 2000. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +14.1% with distributions reinvested, against +14.3% for its benchmark, the Russell 2000 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.19% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,977 positions, with the top ten at 3.3%. It sat 7.6% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, GSSC or IWM?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, GSSC returned +17.1% and IWM +14.1%.
- Which is cheaper, GSSC or IWM?
- IWM is cheaper, by 0.01 percentage points a year. That is about $1 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, GSSC against IWM, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/gssc-vs-iwm
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). GSSC against IWM. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/gssc-vs-iwm
[GSSC against IWM (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/gssc-vs-iwm)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.