Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

IWM vs VIOG: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, IWM returned +14.1% to VIOG's +15.8%; 32% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about IWM and VIOG

Net assets: $75.5bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares Russell 2000 ETF, and $1.0bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF.

At a glance
+14.1%
IWM total return, 1 year
+15.8%
VIOG total return, 1 year
0.19%
IWM expense ratio
0.10%
VIOG expense ratio

Pair scorecard

VIOG costs 0.09 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 1.7 points; IWM is far larger, $78.0bn against $1.0bn.

IWM vs VIOG: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureIWMVIOG
Return
Total return, 1 year+14.1%+15.8%
Drawdown
Below its high7.6%, high on Aug 14, 20268.2%, high on Aug 4, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksRussell 2000 IndexS&P SmallCap 600 Growth Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.19%0.10%
Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026$78.0bn$1.0bn
Holdings
Holdings in common32%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund3.3%9.9%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Sep 17, 2010 to Oct 23, 2026 · 840 weekly returns
IWM VIOG
Return
Total return edge VIOG +426.5% +527.1%
Annualized edge VIOG +10.8% +12.0%
Price return edge VIOG +322.9% +438.4%
Risk
Volatility edge VIOG (slight) 21.2% 20.5%
Max drawdown edge IWM (slight) −40.2% −41.3%
Downside capture 100.5% 99.5%
Beta 1.01 0.99
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge VIOG 0.52 0.58
Sortino edge VIOG 0.75 0.85
Treynor 0.106 0.120
Calmar edge VIOG (slight) 0.27 0.29
Against the benchmark
Alpha −0.1% a year +0.2% a year
Alpha t-stat −0.36 0.29
Information ratio −0.02 0.01
Tracking error 1.0% 2.1%

Each against its own benchmark: IWM against VTWO, Oct 1, 2010 to Oct 23, 2026; VIOG against IJT, Sep 17, 2010 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

VIOG returned more: +527.1% to +426.5%. VIOG swung slightly less: 20.5% to 21.2%. IWM fell slightly less at its worst: −40.2% to −41.3%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: IWM vs VIOG: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureIWMVIOGEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+426.5%+527.1%VIOGPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+10.8%+12.0%VIOGTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+322.9%+438.4%VIOGPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility21.2%20.5%VIOG (slight)Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation14.6%13.9%VIOG (slight)Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−40.2%−41.3%IWM (slight)Deepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture101.0%98.9%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture100.5%99.5%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.010.99Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared1.000.99Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.520.58VIOGReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.750.85VIOGReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1060.120Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.270.29VIOG (slight)Annualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkVTWOIJTThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha−0.1% a year+0.2% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat−0.360.29Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−0.6% to +0.4%−0.9% to +1.2%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio−0.020.01Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error1.0%2.1%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 840 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

32%

By the books each fund has filed, IWM and VIOG hold 32% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

32% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first IWM VIOG
GLAUKOS 0.35% 0.81%
RYMAN HOSPITALITY PROPERTIES REIT 0.30% 0.99%
VIASAT INC 0.30% 1.18%
PROTAGONIST THERAPEUTICS 0.29% 1.11%
TG THERAPEUTICS 0.27% 0.96%
ALKERMES 0.25% 0.83%
ZURN ELKAY WATER SOLUTIONS CORP 0.25% 0.83%
FEDERAL SIGNAL CORP 0.24% 0.82%
MACERICH REIT 0.24% 0.40%
LIFE TIME GROUP HOLDINGS 0.23% 0.66%
TERRENO REALTY REIT 0.23% 0.60%
MAXLINEAR 0.22% 0.40%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in IWM
JFROG 0.37%
TWIST BIOSCIENCE 0.35%
MOOG INC CLASS A 0.34%
BRIGHTSPRING HEALTH SERVICES INC 0.33%
UMB FINANCIAL 0.33%
SM ENERGY 0.32%
10X GENOMICS CLASS A 0.31%
BRINKER INTERNATIONAL INC 0.29%
Only in VIOG
FormFactor Inc 1.42%
MSG Knickerbockers Corp 0.85%
Armstrong World Industries Inc 0.83%
Etsy Inc 0.74%
Everus Construction Group Inc 0.73%
Qorvo Inc 0.72%
Lyft Inc 0.69%
Powell Industries Inc 0.65%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF VIOG Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks the Russell 2000 Tracks an index
Total return, 1 year +14.1% +15.8%
Its benchmark over the same days +14.3% (VTWO) +15.4% (IJT)
Gap to its benchmark −0.2 pts vs VTWO +0.4 pts vs IJT
Expense ratio 0.19% 0.10%
Already in the S&P 500 0.0% 0.0%
Holdings 1977 351
Net assets, IWM as of Oct 27, 2026 and VIOG as of Sep 30, 2026 $75.5bn $1.0bn

IWM and VIOG on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-E45ED17100

IWM and VIOG are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. What each follows. IWM follows Russell 2000 Index and VIOG follows S&P SmallCap 600 Growth Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 32% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026).
  3. Number of holdings. IWM holds 1,977 positions and VIOG holds 351.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

IWM flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
IWM

IWM tracks the Russell 2000. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +14.1% with distributions reinvested, against +14.3% for its benchmark, the Russell 2000 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.19% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,977 positions, with the top ten at 3.3%. It sat 7.6% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

VIOG

VIOG tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +15.8% with distributions reinvested, against +15.4% for its benchmark, the S&P SmallCap 600 Growth Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.10% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 351 positions, with the top ten at 9.9%. It sat 8.2% below its high of Aug 4, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IWM or VIOG?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWM returned +14.1% and VIOG +15.8%.
Which is cheaper, IWM or VIOG?
VIOG is cheaper, by 0.09 percentage points a year. That is about $9 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IWM and VIOG overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of IWM and 0% of VIOG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, IWM against VIOG, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwm-vs-viog

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.