Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
FMF vs QQQ: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, FMF returned +11.1% to QQQ's +12.3%, and QQQ charges 0.18% to FMF's 0.98%.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about FMF and QQQ
Net assets on Nov 3, 2026: $298m for First Trust Managed Futures Strategy Fund and $464.6bn for Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1.
Pair scorecard
QQQ costs 0.80 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 1.2 points; QQQ is far larger, $464.6bn against $298m.
| Measure | FMF | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +11.1% | +12.3% |
| Total return, 52 weeks | +10.6% | |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 8.9%, high on Oct 6, 2026 | |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | not published | Nasdaq-100 Index |
| Treasury bills, 52 weeks | +3.7% | |
| Against cash | 6.9 points ahead | |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.98% | 0.18% |
| Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026 | $298m | $464.6bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | not published | |
| In the S&P 500, by weight | 94% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 46.7% | |
| Risk | ||
| Correlation with the S&P 500’s weekly returns | +0.16 | |
| Beta to the S&P 500 | +0.11: about 0.11% for each 1% | |
| Its average week when the S&P 500 fell | fell 0.11% | |
| Down-week capture | 9.9% | |
| Weeks the S&P 500 fell | 26 of 52, by 1.07% on average | |
Risk and return
Aug 9, 2013 to Oct 30, 2026 · 690 weekly returnsFrom Aug 2013 to Oct 2026, QQQ returned more: +906.5% to +33.8%. FMF swung less: 7.9% to 19.3%. FMF fell less at its worst: −17.7% to −35.1%.
Full scorecard
9 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | FMF | QQQ | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +33.8% | +906.5% | QQQ | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +2.2% | +19.0% | QQQ | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | +5.3% | +802.7% | QQQ | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 7.9% | 19.3% | FMF | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 5.7% | 12.8% | FMF | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −17.7% | −35.1% | FMF | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | 0.07 | 0.90 | QQQ | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 0.10 | 1.35 | QQQ | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Calmar | 0.13 | 0.54 | QQQ | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 690 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
Side by side
FMF and QQQ on the fields both publish, as of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
Client brief:
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
FMF
FMF is a managed futures fund. ETFIQ measures what every alternatives fund is sold on: whether it moves differently from the stock market. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, its weekly returns had a correlation of +0.16 with the S&P 500’s and a beta of +0.11, so for each 1% the index moved it moved about 0.11% the same way. The S&P 500 fell in 26 of those 52 weeks, by 1.07% on average. In the same weeks FMF fell 0.11% on average, a down-week capture of 9.9%. Over the same 52 weeks FMF returned +10.6% and a Treasury bill fund +3.7%, so it finished 6.9 percentage points ahead of cash.
QQQ
QQQ tracks the Nasdaq-100. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 it returned +12.3% with distributions reinvested, against +12.3% for its benchmark, the Nasdaq-100 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Nov 3, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 103 positions, with the top ten at 46.7%. It sat 8.9% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Nov 4, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Are FMF and QQQ in the same category?
- FMF is an alternatives ETF and QQQ is a stock ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
- Which returned more over the last year, FMF or QQQ?
- In the year to Nov 4, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FMF returned +11.1% and QQQ +12.3%.
- Which is cheaper, FMF or QQQ?
- QQQ is cheaper, by 0.80 percentage points a year. That is about $80 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, FMF against QQQ, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fmf-vs-qqq
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). FMF against QQQ. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fmf-vs-qqq
[FMF against QQQ (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fmf-vs-qqq)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.