Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

FMF vs GLD: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, FMF returned +11.1% to GLD's +2.8%, and GLD charges 0.40% to FMF's 0.98%.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about FMF and GLD

Net assets on Nov 3, 2026: $298m for First Trust Managed Futures Strategy Fund and $131.3bn for SPDR Gold Shares.

At a glance
+11.1%
FMF total return, 1 year
+2.8%
GLD total return, 1 year
0.98%
FMF expense ratio
0.40%
GLD expense ratio

Pair scorecard

GLD costs 0.58 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 8.3 points; GLD is far larger, $131.3bn against $298m.

FMF vs GLD: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureFMFGLD
Return
Total return, 1 year+11.1%+2.8%
Total return, 52 weeks+10.6%
Drawdown
Below its high24.9%, high on Jan 29, 2026
Against its benchmark
What it tracksnot publishedGold
Treasury bills, 52 weeks+3.7%
Against cash6.9 points ahead
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.98%0.40%
Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026$298m$131.3bn
Holdings
Holdings in commonnot published
Risk
Correlation with the S&P 500’s weekly returns+0.16
Beta to the S&P 500+0.11: about 0.11% for each 1%
Its average week when the S&P 500 fellfell 0.11%
Down-week capture9.9%
Weeks the S&P 500 fell26 of 52, by 1.07% on average

Method

Side by side

FMF First Trust Managed Futures Strategy Fund GLD SPDR Gold Shares
Where it sits Alternatives ETF Commodity ETF
What it is Managed futures Holds gold
Total return, 1 year +11.1% +2.8%
Its benchmark over the same days not measured +2.9% (IAU)
Gap to its benchmark not measured −0.1 pts vs IAU
Expense ratio 0.98% 0.40%
Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026 $298m $131.3bn

FMF and GLD on the fields both publish, as of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

FMF and GLD flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
FMF

FMF is a managed futures fund. ETFIQ measures what every alternatives fund is sold on: whether it moves differently from the stock market. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, its weekly returns had a correlation of +0.16 with the S&P 500’s and a beta of +0.11, so for each 1% the index moved it moved about 0.11% the same way. The S&P 500 fell in 26 of those 52 weeks, by 1.07% on average. In the same weeks FMF fell 0.11% on average, a down-week capture of 9.9%. Over the same 52 weeks FMF returned +10.6% and a Treasury bill fund +3.7%, so it finished 6.9 percentage points ahead of cash.

GLD

Its expense ratio is 0.40% a year, for the three months to Jun 30, 2026, as its 10-Q states.

GLD holds gold. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 it returned +2.8% with distributions reinvested, against +2.9% for its benchmark, the price of gold. It sat 24.9% below its high of Jan 29, 2026 on Nov 4, 2026.

Questions people ask

Are FMF and GLD in the same category?
FMF is an alternatives ETF and GLD is a commodity ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
Which returned more over the last year, FMF or GLD?
In the year to Nov 4, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FMF returned +11.1% and GLD +2.8%.
Which is cheaper, FMF or GLD?
GLD is cheaper, by 0.58 percentage points a year. That is about $58 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's own filings.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, FMF against GLD, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fmf-vs-gld

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.