FLTR vs SGOV: Differences, Returns & Fees
FLTR's duration was 0.0 years on Jul 31, 2026 and SGOV's 0.1 on May 31, 2026; SGOV charges 0.09% to FLTR's 0.14%. Net assets: $3.6bn on Oct 19, 2026 for VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF, and $116.5bn on Oct 20, 2026 for iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF.
SGOV costs 0.05 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 1.0 point; SGOV is far larger, $116.3bn against $3.6bn.
| FLTR | SGOV | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.14% | 0.09% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 19, 2026 | $3.6bn | $116.3bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +4.7% | +3.7% |
| What it tracks | MVIS US Investment Grade Floating Rate Index | ICE 0-3 Month US Treasury Securities Index |
| Holdings in common | report dates differ | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026.
FLTR and SGOV are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- What each follows. FLTR follows MVIS US Investment Grade Floating Rate Index and SGOV follows ICE 0-3 Month US Treasury Securities Index.
- Number of holdings. FLTR holds 455 positions and SGOV holds 23.
- Size. FLTR has $3.6bn in net assets and SGOV $116.3bn (net assets, as of Oct 19, 2026); SGOV is 32.3 times larger.
Data as of Oct 20, 2026. The differences are picked by a fixed rule, in a fixed order; the PDF prints it. Page 2 has the returns, overlap, risks and sources.
Take this comparison to a client
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
Not advice. The brief uses the figures on this page, with the data date and a report id. Saved comparisons are listed on your saved page; privacy.
On the same fields
FLTR and SGOV on the fields both publish, as of Oct 20, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About FLTR
FLTR tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +4.7% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.14% a year.
About SGOV
SGOV tracks an index of 0-3 month T-bills. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +3.7% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, FLTR or SGOV?
- In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FLTR returned +4.7% and SGOV +3.7%.
- Which is cheaper, FLTR or SGOV?
- SGOV is cheaper, by 0.05 percentage points a year. That is about $5 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, FLTR against SGOV, data as of Oct 20, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fltr-vs-sgov
ETFIQ. (Oct 20, 2026). FLTR against SGOV. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fltr-vs-sgov
[FLTR against SGOV (ETFIQ, Oct 20, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fltr-vs-sgov)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.