Which returned more over the last year, FLTR or IBTH?

In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FLTR returned +4.7% and IBTH +2.8%.

Which is cheaper, FLTR or IBTH?

IBTH is cheaper, by 0.07 percentage points a year. That is about $7 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Share on X Download as PDF

Compare their flows Ask IQ about these two funds

FLTR vs IBTH: Differences, Returns & Fees

On Jul 31, 2026 FLTR's duration was 0.0 years and IBTH's 0.9; IBTH charges 0.07% to FLTR's 0.14%. Net assets: $3.6bn on Oct 19, 2026 for VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF, and $2.4bn on Oct 20, 2026 for iShares iBonds Dec 2027 Term Treasury ETF.

Ask IQ about this page

Ask IQ about FLTR and IBTH

Answers cite the figures on this page.

IBTH costs 0.07 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 1.9 points; FLTR is 1.5 times larger.

FLTR vs IBTH: Differences, Returns & Fees
	FLTR	IBTH
Expense ratio	0.14%	0.07%
Net assets, as of Oct 19, 2026	$3.6bn	$2.4bn
Total return, 1 year	+4.7%	+2.8%
What it tracks	MVIS US Investment Grade Floating Rate Index	ICE 2027 Maturity US Treasury Index
Holdings in common	0%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026.

+4.7%

FLTR total return, 1 year

+2.8%

IBTH total return, 1 year

0.14%

FLTR expense ratio

0.07%

IBTH expense ratio

Client brief · page 1 of 2Report BR-0C523C1C50

FLTR and IBTH are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

What each follows. FLTR follows MVIS US Investment Grade Floating Rate Index and IBTH follows ICE 2027 Maturity US Treasury Index.
Holdings in common. 0% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Jul 31, 2026).
Number of holdings. FLTR holds 455 positions and IBTH holds 51.

Data as of Oct 20, 2026. The differences are picked by a fixed rule, in a fixed order; the PDF prints it. Page 2 has the returns, overlap, risks and sources.

Take this comparison to a client

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Not advice. The brief uses the figures on this page, with the data date and a report id. Saved comparisons are listed on your saved page; privacy.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, FLTR and IBTH hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026.

50%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first

Holding FLTR IBTH

Only in FLTR

Commonwealth Bank of Australia, due Mar 14, 2030 1.26%

HSBC Holdings PLC, due May 13, 2031 1.08%

HSBC Holdings PLC, due Mar 10, 2032 1.06%

Westpac Banking Corp, due Jun 12, 2031 1.03%

Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group Inc, due Sep 12, 2031 0.84%

Sumitomo Mitsui Trust Bank Ltd, due Mar 13, 2030 0.83%

Abbott Laboratories, due Mar 9, 2029 0.83%

Amazon.com Inc, due Mar 13, 2029 0.82%

Only in IBTH

U.S. Treasury Notes, due Jan 31, 2027 2.93%

U.S. Treasury Notes, due Jun 30, 2027 2.78%

U.S. Treasury Notes, due Sep 30, 2027 2.75%

U.S. Treasury Notes, due Oct 31, 2027 2.71%

U.S. Treasury Notes, due Nov 30, 2027 2.69%

U.S. Treasury Notes, due Mar 31, 2027 2.69%

U.S. Treasury Notes, due Apr 30, 2027 2.68%

U.S. Treasury Notes, due Feb 28, 2027 2.68%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

FLTR

VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF

IBTH

iShares iBonds Dec 2027 Term Treasury ETF

Where it sits Bond ETF Bond ETF

Issuer VanEck iShares

What it is Tracks an index Tracks an index

Total return, 1 year +4.7% +2.8%

Expense ratio 0.14% 0.07%

Holdings 455 51

Net assets, FLTR as of Oct 19, 2026 and IBTH as of Oct 20, 2026 $3.6bn $2.4bn

FLTR and IBTH on the fields both publish, as of Oct 20, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

About FLTR

FLTR tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +4.7% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.14% a year.

About IBTH

IBTH tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +2.8% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FLTR or IBTH?: In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FLTR returned +4.7% and IBTH +2.8%.
Which is cheaper, FLTR or IBTH?: IBTH is cheaper, by 0.07 percentage points a year. That is about $7 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

CLIP vs FLTR FLTR vs TBLL FLTR vs IBDR FLTR vs IBTG IBTH vs YEAR IBTH vs RAVI IBTH vs VGUS IBTH vs VNLA

FLTR on its own →IBTH on its own →Hold both: look the portfolio through →Rankings →FLTR dividend history →FLTR holdings →IBTH dividend history →IBTH holdings →Standards and sources →

Where these figures came from

FLTR filings on SEC EDGAR ↗FLTR prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗VanEck website ↗IBTH filings on SEC EDGAR ↗IBTH prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗iShares page for IBTH ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, FLTR against IBTH, data as of Oct 20, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fltr-vs-ibth

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.