BSCQ vs FLTR: Differences, Returns & Fees
BSCQ's duration was 0.3 years on May 31, 2026 and FLTR's 0.0 on Jul 31, 2026; BSCQ charges 0.10% to FLTR's 0.14%. Net assets: $3.1bn on Oct 20, 2026 for Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF, and $3.6bn on Oct 19, 2026 for VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF.
BSCQ costs 0.04 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.9 points; FLTR is 1.2 times larger.
| BSCQ | FLTR | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.10% | 0.14% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 19, 2026 | $3.1bn | $3.6bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +3.8% | +4.7% |
| What it tracks | not read by ETFIQ | MVIS US Investment Grade Floating Rate Index |
| Holdings in common | report dates differ | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026.
BSCQ and FLTR are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- What each follows. BSCQ follows not read by ETFIQ and FLTR follows MVIS US Investment Grade Floating Rate Index.
- Number of holdings. BSCQ holds 64 positions and FLTR holds 455.
- One-year total return (similar). Over 1 year to Oct 20, 2026 BSCQ returned +3.8% and FLTR +4.7% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 0.9 points.
Data as of Oct 20, 2026. The differences are picked by a fixed rule, in a fixed order; the PDF prints it. Page 2 has the returns, overlap, risks and sources.
Take this comparison to a client
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
Not advice. The brief uses the figures on this page, with the data date and a report id. Saved comparisons are listed on your saved page; privacy.
On the same fields
BSCQ and FLTR on the fields both publish, as of Oct 20, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About BSCQ
BSCQ tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +3.8% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.10% a year.
About FLTR
FLTR tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +4.7% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.14% a year.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, BSCQ or FLTR?
- In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BSCQ returned +3.8% and FLTR +4.7%.
- Which is cheaper, BSCQ or FLTR?
- BSCQ is cheaper, by 0.04 percentage points a year. That is about $4 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, BSCQ against FLTR, data as of Oct 20, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bscq-vs-fltr
ETFIQ. (Oct 20, 2026). BSCQ against FLTR. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bscq-vs-fltr
[BSCQ against FLTR (ETFIQ, Oct 20, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bscq-vs-fltr)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.