A
vs
B
Share
Compare their flowsAsk IQ about these two funds

FLTR vs GBIL: Differences, Returns & Fees

FLTR's duration was 0.0 years on Jul 31, 2026 and GBIL's 0.4 on May 31, 2026; GBIL charges 0.12% to FLTR's 0.14%. Net assets on Oct 19, 2026: $3.6bn for VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF and $7.9bn for Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF.

Ask IQ about this page

Ask IQ about FLTR and GBIL

Answers cite the figures on this page.

GBIL costs 0.02 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 1.1 points; GBIL is 2.2 times larger.

FLTR vs GBIL: Differences, Returns & Fees
FLTRGBIL
Expense ratio0.14%0.12%
Net assets, as of Oct 19, 2026$3.6bn$7.9bn
Total return, 1 year+4.7%+3.6%
What it tracksMVIS US Investment Grade Floating Rate Indexnot read by ETFIQ
Holdings in commonreport dates differ

Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026.

+4.7%
FLTR total return, 1 year
+3.6%
GBIL total return, 1 year
0.14%
FLTR expense ratio
0.12%
GBIL expense ratio

Get FLTR's fund flows by email, every Monday.

Plus the Friday ETF note. Confirm from the link that arrives, and unsubscribe in one click. See Privacy.

Client brief · page 1 of 2Report BR-21FA6A6DAF

FLTR and GBIL are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. What each follows. FLTR follows MVIS US Investment Grade Floating Rate Index and GBIL follows not read by ETFIQ.
  2. Number of holdings. FLTR holds 455 positions and GBIL holds 43.
  3. One-year total return (similar). Over 1 year to Oct 20, 2026 FLTR returned +4.7% and GBIL +3.6% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 1.1 points.

Data as of Oct 20, 2026. The differences are picked by a fixed rule, in a fixed order; the PDF prints it. Page 2 has the returns, overlap, risks and sources.

Take this comparison to a client

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Not advice. The brief uses the figures on this page, with the data date and a report id. Saved comparisons are listed on your saved page; privacy.

On the same fields

FLTR
VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF
GBIL
Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Bond ETF
Issuer VanEck Goldman Sachs
What it is Tracks an index Tracks an index
Total return, 1 year +4.7% +3.6%
Expense ratio 0.14% 0.12%
Holdings 455 43
Net assets, as of Oct 19, 2026 $3.6bn $7.9bn

FLTR and GBIL on the fields both publish, as of Oct 20, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

About FLTR

FLTR tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +4.7% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.14% a year.

About GBIL

GBIL tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +3.6% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.12% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FLTR or GBIL?
In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FLTR returned +4.7% and GBIL +3.6%.
Which is cheaper, FLTR or GBIL?
GBIL is cheaper, by 0.02 percentage points a year. That is about $2 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
FLTR vs FTSMFLTR vs USFRFLTR vs VNLAFLTR vs PULSGBIL vs GSYGBIL vs IBDSGBIL vs IBTHGBIL vs TBUX
FLTR on its own →GBIL on its own →Hold both: look the portfolio through →Rankings →FLTR dividend history →FLTR holdings →GBIL dividend history →GBIL holdings →Standards and sources →
Where these figures came from
FLTR filings on SEC EDGAR ↗FLTR prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗VanEck website ↗GBIL filings on SEC EDGAR ↗GBIL prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗Goldman Sachs website ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, FLTR against GBIL, data as of Oct 20, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fltr-vs-gbil

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.