FLQM vs PRFZ: Differences, Returns & Fees
FLQM and PRFZ hold 3% of their weight in the same names, and PRFZ returned +16.1% over the year. Net assets on Oct 20, 2026: $1.5bn for Franklin U.S. Mid Cap Multifactor Index ETF and $2.6bn for Invesco RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF.
FLQM costs 0.06 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 5.8 points; PRFZ is 1.8 times larger.
| FLQM | PRFZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.30% | 0.36% |
| Net assets | $1.5bn | $2.6bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +10.3% | +16.1% |
| What it tracks | not read by ETFIQ | RAFI Fundamental Select US 1500 Index |
| Holdings in common | 3% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 11.3% | 4.0% |
| Below its high | 6.9%, high on Aug 14, 2026 | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 19, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, FLQM and PRFZ hold 3% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 19, 2026.
half
3% in common
On the same fields
FLQM and PRFZ on the fields both publish, as of Oct 20, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About FLQM
FLQM tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +10.3% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.30% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 68% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 205 positions, with the top ten at 11.3%.
About PRFZ
PRFZ tracks an index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.36% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 19, 2026, 2% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,491 positions, with the top ten at 4.0%. It sat 6.9% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 20, 2026.
Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +16.1% with distributions reinvested, against +15.0% for its benchmark, the Russell 3000 Index.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, FLQM or PRFZ?
- In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FLQM returned +10.3% and PRFZ +16.1%.
- Which is cheaper, FLQM or PRFZ?
- FLQM is cheaper, by 0.06 percentage points a year. That is about $6 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, FLQM against PRFZ, data as of Oct 20, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/flqm-vs-prfz
ETFIQ. (Oct 20, 2026). FLQM against PRFZ. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/flqm-vs-prfz
[FLQM against PRFZ (ETFIQ, Oct 20, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/flqm-vs-prfz)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.