Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
FPX vs PRFZ: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, FPX returned +2.9% to PRFZ's +17.3%; 4% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about FPX and PRFZNet assets on Oct 27, 2026: $1.4bn for First Trust US Equity Opportunities ETF and $2.7bn for Invesco RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF.
Pair scorecard
PRFZ costs 0.21 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 14.4 points; PRFZ is 1.9 times larger.
| Measure | FPX | PRFZ |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +2.9% | +17.3% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 15.9%, high on Jun 30, 2026 | 5.3%, high on Aug 14, 2026 |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | IPOX -100 U.S. Index | RAFI Fundamental Select US 1500 Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.57% | 0.36% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 | $1.4bn | $2.7bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 4% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 46.4% | 4.1% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, FPX and PRFZ hold 4% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.
half
4% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
FPX and PRFZ on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
FPX and PRFZ do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?
- What each follows. FPX follows IPOX -100 U.S. Index and PRFZ follows RAFI Fundamental Select US 1500 Index.
- Holdings in common. 4% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 FPX returned +2.9% and PRFZ +17.3% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 14.4 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
FPX
FPX tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +2.9% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.57% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 51% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 99 positions, with the top ten at 46.4%. It sat 15.9% below its high of Jun 30, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +17.3% with distributions reinvested, against +13.3% for its benchmark, the Russell 3000 Index.
PRFZ tracks an index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.36% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 2% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,491 positions, with the top ten at 4.1%. It sat 5.3% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, FPX or PRFZ?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FPX returned +2.9% and PRFZ +17.3%.
- Which is cheaper, FPX or PRFZ?
- PRFZ is cheaper, by 0.21 percentage points a year. That is about $21 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, FPX against PRFZ, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fpx-vs-prfz
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). FPX against PRFZ. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fpx-vs-prfz
[FPX against PRFZ (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fpx-vs-prfz)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.