Which returned more over the last year, FLQL or MTUM?

In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FLQL returned +18.4% and MTUM +25.8%.

Which is cheaper, FLQL or MTUM?

Neither: FLQL and MTUM both charge 0.15% a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

How much do FLQL and MTUM overlap with the S&P 500?

By their latest filed holdings, 90% of FLQL and 93% of MTUM by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.

Compare their flows Ask IQ about these two funds

FLQL vs MTUM: Differences, Returns & Fees

FLQL and MTUM hold 37% of their weight in the same names, and MTUM returned +25.8% over the year. Net assets on Oct 9, 2026: $2.2bn for Franklin U.S. Large Cap Multifactor Index ETF and $20.3bn for iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF.

Both cost 0.15% a year; their one-year returns differ by 7.4 points; MTUM is 9.2 times larger.

FLQL vs MTUM: Differences, Returns & Fees
	FLQL	MTUM
Expense ratio	0.15%	0.15%
Net assets	$2.2bn	$20.3bn
Total return, 1 year	+18.4%	+25.8%
What it tracks	not read by ETFIQ	MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index
Holdings in common	37%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund	36.0%	36.1%
Below its high		7.1%, high on Jun 22, 2026

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

+18.4%

FLQL total return, 1 year

+25.8%

MTUM total return, 1 year

0.15%

FLQL expense ratio

0.15%

MTUM expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, FLQL and MTUM hold 37% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

50%

half

37% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first

Holding FLQL MTUM

ALPHABET INC 3.77% 2.69%

APPLIED MATERIALS INC 2.25% 3.03%

ALPHABET INC 3.02% 2.12%

LAM RESEARCH CORP 1.98% 2.34%

JOHNSON & JOHNSON 1.86% 3.14%

CATERPILLAR INC 1.77% 2.02%

EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 1.72% 2.60%

CISCO SYSTEMS INC 1.52% 3.63%

MERCK & COMPANY INC 1.28% 1.74%

KLA CORP 1.98% 1.24%

GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC (THE) 1.29% 0.92%

MORGAN STANLEY 1.30% 0.92%

Only in FLQL

APPLE INC 6.88%

NVIDIA CORP 6.72%

MICROSOFT CORP 3.82%

AMAZON.COM INC 3.07%

BROADCOM INC 2.47%

META PLATFORMS INC 1.81%

ABBVIE INC 1.66%

ELI LILLY & COMPANY 1.38%

Only in MTUM

INTEL CORPORATION 4.09%

PALO ALTO NETWORKS 2.81%

SANDISK 2.74%

MARVELL TECHNOLOGY 2.13%

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS PLC 2.02%

UNITEDHEALTH GROUP 1.92%

COCA-COLA 1.79%

CROWDSTRIKE HOLDINGS CLASS A 1.75%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

FLQL

Franklin U.S. Large Cap Multifactor Index ETF

MTUM

iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF

Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF

Issuer Franklin iShares

What it is Tracks an index Tracks the MSCI USA Momentum Factor

Total return, 1 year +18.4% +25.8%

Expense ratio 0.15% 0.15%

Already in the S&P 500 89.5% 93.2%

Holdings 215 126

Net assets $2.2bn $20.3bn

FLQL and MTUM on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

About FLQL

FLQL tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +18.4% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 90% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 215 positions, with the top ten at 36.0%.

About MTUM

MTUM tracks the MSCI USA Momentum Factor. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +25.8% with distributions reinvested. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 93% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 126 positions, with the top ten at 36.1%. It sat 7.1% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FLQL or MTUM?: In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FLQL returned +18.4% and MTUM +25.8%.
Which is cheaper, FLQL or MTUM?: Neither: FLQL and MTUM both charge 0.15% a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do FLQL and MTUM overlap with the S&P 500?: By their latest filed holdings, 90% of FLQL and 93% of MTUM by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.

Other comparisons

FLQL vs IWV FLQL vs OEF FLQL vs SPHQ FLQL vs SPMO MTUM vs VOO MTUM vs QDF MTUM vs TILT MTUM vs SFLR

FLQL on its own →MTUM on its own →Hold both: look the portfolio through →Rankings →Standards and sources →

Where these figures came from

FLQL filings on SEC EDGAR ↗FLQL prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗Franklin website ↗MTUM filings on SEC EDGAR ↗MTUM prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗iShares page for MTUM ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, FLQL against MTUM, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/flql-vs-mtum

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.