FLQL vs IWB: Differences, Returns & Fees

FLQL and IWB hold 53% of their weight in the same names, and FLQL returned +18.4% over the year. Net assets on Oct 9, 2026: $2.2bn for Franklin U.S. Large Cap Multifactor Index ETF and $49.6bn for iShares Russell 1000 ETF.

Both cost 0.15% a year; their one-year returns differ by 1.8 points; IWB is far larger, $49.6bn against $2.2bn.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

FLQL vs IWB: Differences, Returns & Fees
FLQLIWB
Expense ratio0.15%0.15%
Net assets$2.2bn$49.6bn
Total return, 1 year+18.4%+16.6%
What it tracksnot read by ETFIQRussell 1000 Index
Holdings in common53%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund36.0%36.1%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

+18.4%
FLQL total return, 1 year
+16.6%
IWB total return, 1 year
0.15%
FLQL expense ratio
0.15%
IWB expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, FLQL and IWB hold 53% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

half

53% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding FLQL IWB
APPLE INC 6.88% 6.77%
NVIDIA CORP 6.72% 7.44%
MICROSOFT CORP 3.82% 5.53%
AMAZON.COM INC 3.07% 3.54%
ALPHABET INC 3.77% 2.85%
BROADCOM INC 2.47% 2.34%
ALPHABET INC 3.02% 2.30%
META PLATFORMS INC 1.81% 2.20%
TESLA INC 1.35% 1.56%
ELI LILLY & COMPANY 1.38% 1.31%
JP MORGAN CHASE & COMPANY 1.11% 1.24%
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC 0.97% 1.34%
Only in FLQL
ELECTRONIC ARTS INC 0.28%
WEBSTER FINANCIAL CORP 0.10%
Only in IWB
VISA CLASS A 0.91%
WALMART 0.68%
INTEL CORPORATION 0.67%
MASTERCARD CLASS A 0.66%
PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES CLASS A 0.65%
COSTCO WHOLESALE CORP 0.58%
CHEVRON 0.55%
BANK OF AMERICA 0.49%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

FLQL
Franklin U.S. Large Cap Multifactor Index ETF
IWB
iShares Russell 1000 ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index Tracks the Russell 1000
Total return, 1 year +18.4% +16.6%
Its benchmark over the same days not published +16.8% (VONE)
Gap to its benchmark not available −0.1 pts vs VONE
Expense ratio 0.15% 0.15%
Already in the S&P 500 89.5% 91.7%
Holdings 215 1025
Net assets $2.2bn $49.6bn

FLQL and IWB on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

About FLQL

FLQL tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +18.4% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 90% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 215 positions, with the top ten at 36.0%.

About IWB

IWB tracks the Russell 1000. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +16.6% with distributions reinvested, against +16.8% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Index. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,025 positions, with the top ten at 36.1%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FLQL or IWB?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FLQL returned +18.4% and IWB +16.6%.
Which is cheaper, FLQL or IWB?
Neither: FLQL and IWB both charge 0.15% a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do FLQL and IWB overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 90% of FLQL and 92% of IWB by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, FLQL against IWB, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/flql-vs-iwb

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.