Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

FLKR vs TLT: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, FLKR returned +79.7% to TLT's −7.9%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about FLKR and TLT

Net assets: $1.9bn on Oct 28, 2026 for Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF, and $47.4bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF.

At a glance
+79.7%
FLKR total return, 1 year
−7.9%
TLT total return, 1 year
0.09%
FLKR expense ratio
0.15%
TLT expense ratio

Pair scorecard

FLKR costs 0.06 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 87.6 points; TLT is far larger, $47.8bn against $1.7bn.

FLKR vs TLT: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureFLKRTLT
Return
Total return, 1 year+79.7%−7.9%
Drawdown
Below its high24.1%, high on Jun 22, 202642.6%, high on Aug 4, 2020
Benchmark
What it tracksFTSE South Korea RIC Capped IndexICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.09%0.15%
Net assets, as of Oct 26, 2026$1.7bn$47.8bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund64.6%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Nov 17, 2017 to Oct 23, 2026 · 466 weekly returns
FLKR TLT
Return
Total return edge FLKR +144.1% −16.6%
Annualized edge FLKR +10.5% −2.0%
Price return edge FLKR +92.4% −35.6%
Risk
Volatility edge TLT 29.4% 14.2%
Max drawdown edge TLT (slight) −50.1% −47.8%
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge FLKR 0.39 −0.26
Sortino edge FLKR 0.58 −0.36
Calmar edge FLKR 0.21 −0.04
Reading

FLKR returned more: +144.1% to −16.6%. TLT swung less: 14.2% to 29.4%. TLT fell slightly less at its worst: −47.8% to −50.1%.

Full scorecard

9 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: FLKR vs TLT: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureFLKRTLTEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+144.1%−16.6%FLKRPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+10.5%−2.0%FLKRTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+92.4%−35.6%FLKRPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility29.4%14.2%TLTSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation20.0%10.5%TLTLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−50.1%−47.8%TLT (slight)Deepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.39−0.26FLKRReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.58−0.36FLKRReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Calmar0.21−0.04FLKRAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 466 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, FLKR and TLT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first FLKR TLT
Only in one fund ↓
Only in FLKR
SK HYNIX INC 27.39%
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD 18.00%
SK SQUARE CO LTD 4.30%
SAMSUNG ELECTRO MECHANICS 4.17%
HYUNDAI MOTOR COMPANY 2.46%
KB FINANCIAL GROUP INC 2.01%
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD 1.99%
SHINHAN FINANCIAL GROUP COMPANY LTD 1.50%
Only in TLT
TREASURY BOND 4.32%
TREASURY BOND 4.12%
TREASURY BOND (OLD) 4.07%
TREASURY BOND 4.02%
TREASURY BOND 3.93%
TREASURY BOND 3.92%
TREASURY BOND 3.89%
TREASURY BOND 3.88%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

FLKR Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF TLT iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Bond ETF
What it is Tracks the FTSE South Korea Tracks an index of 20+ year Treasuries
Total return, 1 year +79.7% −7.9%
Its benchmark over the same days not measured −7.8% (BBLB)
Gap to its benchmark not measured −0.1 pts vs BBLB
Expense ratio 0.09% 0.15%
Holdings 156 47
Net assets, FLKR as of Oct 28, 2026 and TLT as of Oct 27, 2026 $1.9bn $47.4bn

FLKR and TLT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief

No client brief for this pair: the two funds' holdings are dated 119 days apart.

Alert

TLT flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
FLKR

FLKR tracks the FTSE South Korea. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +79.7% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 156 positions, with the top ten at 64.6%. It sat 24.1% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

TLT

TLT tracks an index of 20+ year Treasuries. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −7.9% with distributions reinvested, against −7.8% for its benchmark, the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. It sat 42.6% below its high of Aug 4, 2020 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FLKR or TLT?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FLKR returned +79.7% and TLT −7.9%.
Which is cheaper, FLKR or TLT?
FLKR is cheaper, by 0.06 percentage points a year. That is about $6 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, FLKR against TLT, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/flkr-vs-tlt

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.