Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

FLKR vs LQD: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, FLKR returned +79.7% to LQD's −3.4%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about FLKR and LQD

Net assets: $1.9bn on Oct 28, 2026 for Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF, and $30.6bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF.

At a glance
+79.7%
FLKR total return, 1 year
−3.4%
LQD total return, 1 year
0.09%
FLKR expense ratio
0.14%
LQD expense ratio

Pair scorecard

FLKR costs 0.05 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 83.1 points; LQD is 16.8 times larger.

FLKR vs LQD: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureFLKRLQD
Return
Total return, 1 year+79.7%−3.4%
Drawdown
Below its high24.1%, high on Jun 22, 20266.3%, high on Sep 22, 2021
Benchmark
What it tracksFTSE South Korea RIC Capped IndexMarkit iBoxx USD Liquid Investment Grade Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.09%0.14%
Net assets, as of Oct 23, 2026$1.8bn$30.2bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund64.6%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, FLKR and LQD hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first FLKR LQD
Only in one fund ↓
Only in FLKR
SK HYNIX INC 27.39%
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD 18.00%
SK SQUARE CO LTD 4.30%
SAMSUNG ELECTRO MECHANICS 4.17%
HYUNDAI MOTOR COMPANY 2.46%
KB FINANCIAL GROUP INC 2.01%
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD 1.99%
SHINHAN FINANCIAL GROUP COMPANY LTD 1.50%
Only in LQD
ANHEUSER-BUSCH COMPANIES LLC 0.20%
CVS HEALTH CORP 0.17%
SPACE EXPLORATION TECHNOLOGIES COR 144A 0.16%
T-MOBILE USA INC 0.16%
AMAZON.COM INC 0.14%
BOEING CO 0.14%
CITIGROUP INC 0.14%
GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC 0.14%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

FLKR Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF LQD iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Bond ETF
What it is Tracks the FTSE South Korea Tracks an index of US investment grade bonds
Total return, 1 year +79.7% −3.4%
Its benchmark over the same days not measured −1.2% (IUSB)
Gap to its benchmark not measured −2.2 pts vs IUSB
Expense ratio 0.09% 0.14%
Holdings 156 3191
Net assets, FLKR as of Oct 28, 2026 and LQD as of Oct 27, 2026 $1.9bn $30.6bn

FLKR and LQD on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

LQD flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
FLKR

FLKR tracks the FTSE South Korea. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +79.7% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 156 positions, with the top ten at 64.6%. It sat 24.1% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

LQD

LQD tracks an index of US investment grade bonds. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −3.4% with distributions reinvested, against −1.2% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Universal Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.14% a year. It sat 6.3% below its high of Sep 22, 2021 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FLKR or LQD?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FLKR returned +79.7% and LQD −3.4%.
Which is cheaper, FLKR or LQD?
FLKR is cheaper, by 0.05 percentage points a year. That is about $5 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, FLKR against LQD, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/flkr-vs-lqd

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.