Which returned more over the last year, EWY or LQD?

In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EWY returned +147.9% and LQD returned −2.7%, so EWY returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, EWY or LQD?

EWY charges 0.59% a year and LQD charges 0.14%, so LQD is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

EWY vs LQD: how they differ

EWY and LQD hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and EWY returned more over the year.

iShares MSCI South Korea ETF and iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, EWY and LQD hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in EWY	Only in LQD
SK HYNIX 24.02%	BLK CSH FND TREASURY SL AGENCY 0.88%
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS LTD 22.13%	ANHEUSER-BUSCH COMPANIES LLC 0.12%
SK SQUARE 3.01%	DEUTSCHE TELEKOM INTERNATIONAL FIN 0.11%
KRW CASH 2.49%	CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS OPERATING L 144A 0.10%
SAMSUNG ELECTRO MECHANICS LTD 2.46%	JPMORGAN CHASE & CO MTN 0.09%
KB FINANCIAL GROUP 1.92%	BRITISH TELECOMMUNICATIONS PLC 0.08%
HYUNDAI MOTOR 1.60%	MORGAN STANLEY (FXD-FRN) MTN 0.08%
SHINHAN FINANCIAL GROUP 1.57%	CITIGROUP INC (FX-FRN) 0.07%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.

EWY and LQD on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	EWY iShares MSCI South Korea ETF	LQD iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	iShares	iShares
What it is	MSCI South Korea	US investment grade bonds
Total return, 1 year	+147.9%	−2.7%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	+130.4 pts	−20.2 pts
Expense ratio	0.59%	0.14%
Holdings	80	3149

EWY in plain words

EWY is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI South Korea. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +147.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 80 positions, with the top ten at 61.9%. It sat 13.9% below its high of Jun 18, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

LQD in plain words

LQD is a bond fund tracking the US investment grade bonds. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −2.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.14% a year. It sat 6.4% below its high of Sep 22, 2021 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, EWY or LQD?: In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EWY returned +147.9% and LQD returned −2.7%, so EWY returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, EWY or LQD?: EWY charges 0.59% a year and LQD charges 0.14%, so LQD is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

EWY against LQD, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, EWY against LQD, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ewy-vs-lqd Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources