Which returned more over the last year, LQD or VT?

In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, LQD returned −2.7% and VT returned +18.9%, so VT returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, LQD or VT?

LQD charges 0.14% a year and VT charges 0.06%, so VT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

LQD vs VT: how they differ

LQD and VT hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and VT returned more over the year.

iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF and Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, LQD and VT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions LQD and VT both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding	LQD	VT
JBS NV	0.02%	0.01%

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in LQD	Only in VT
BLK CSH FND TREASURY SL AGENCY 0.88%	NVIDIA Corp 4.22%
ANHEUSER-BUSCH COMPANIES LLC 0.12%	Apple Inc 3.53%
DEUTSCHE TELEKOM INTERNATIONAL FIN 0.11%	Microsoft Corp 2.73%
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS OPERATING L 144A 0.10%	Amazon.com Inc 2.29%
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO MTN 0.09%	Alphabet Inc 2.04%
BRITISH TELECOMMUNICATIONS PLC 0.08%	Broadcom Inc 1.74%
MORGAN STANLEY (FXD-FRN) MTN 0.08%	Alphabet Inc 1.61%
CITIGROUP INC (FX-FRN) 0.07%	Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Lt 1.52%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Sep 10, 2026.

LQD and VT on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	LQD iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF	VT Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	iShares	Vanguard
What it is	US investment grade bonds	Total World Stock
Total return, 1 year	−2.7%	+18.9%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−20.2 pts	+1.4 pts
Expense ratio	0.14%	0.06%
Holdings	3149	10042

LQD in plain words

LQD is a bond fund tracking the US investment grade bonds. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −2.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.14% a year. It sat 6.4% below its high of Sep 22, 2021 on Sep 11, 2026.

VT in plain words

VT is an index equity fund tracking the Total World Stock. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +18.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 55% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 10042 positions, with the top ten at 21.9%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, LQD or VT?: In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, LQD returned −2.7% and VT returned +18.9%, so VT returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, LQD or VT?: LQD charges 0.14% a year and VT charges 0.06%, so VT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

LQD against VT, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, LQD against VT, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/lqd-vs-vt Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources