Which returned more over the last year, LQD or VWO?

In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, LQD returned −2.7% and VWO returned +15.6%, so VWO returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, LQD or VWO?

LQD charges 0.14% a year and VWO charges 0.06%, so VWO is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

LQD vs VWO: how they differ

LQD and VWO hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and VWO returned more over the year.

iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF and Vanguard Emerging Markets Stock Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, LQD and VWO hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in LQD	Only in VWO
BLK CSH FND TREASURY SL AGENCY 0.88%	Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Lt 14.73%
ANHEUSER-BUSCH COMPANIES LLC 0.12%	Tencent Holdings Ltd 3.28%
DEUTSCHE TELEKOM INTERNATIONAL FIN 0.11%	Alibaba Group Holding Ltd 2.57%
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS OPERATING L 144A 0.10%	Delta Electronics Inc 1.18%
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO MTN 0.09%	MediaTek Inc 1.07%
BRITISH TELECOMMUNICATIONS PLC 0.08%	Reliance Industries Ltd 0.90%
MORGAN STANLEY (FXD-FRN) MTN 0.08%	HDFC Bank Ltd 0.81%
CITIGROUP INC (FX-FRN) 0.07%	Hon Hai Precision Industry Co Ltd 0.75%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Sep 10, 2026.

LQD and VWO on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	LQD iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF	VWO Vanguard Emerging Markets Stock Index Fund
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	iShares	Vanguard
What it is	US investment grade bonds	Emerging markets
Total return, 1 year	−2.7%	+15.6%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−20.2 pts	−1.9 pts
Expense ratio	0.14%	0.06%
Holdings	3149	6355

LQD in plain words

LQD is a bond fund tracking the US investment grade bonds. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −2.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.14% a year. It sat 6.4% below its high of Sep 22, 2021 on Sep 11, 2026.

VWO in plain words

VWO is an index equity fund tracking the Emerging markets. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +15.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 6355 positions, with the top ten at 26.8%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, LQD or VWO?: In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, LQD returned −2.7% and VWO returned +15.6%, so VWO returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, LQD or VWO?: LQD charges 0.14% a year and VWO charges 0.06%, so VWO is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

LQD against VWO, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, LQD against VWO, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/lqd-vs-vwo Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources