FDVV vs NULV: Differences, Returns & Fees
FDVV and NULV hold 19% of their weight in the same names, and NULV returned +25.6% over the year. Net assets: $10.2bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Fidelity High Dividend ETF, and $2.2bn on Jul 31, 2026 for Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Value ETF.
FDVV costs 0.11 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 11.5 points; FDVV is 4.6 times larger.
| FDVV | NULV | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.15% | 0.26% |
| Net assets, as of Jul 31, 2026 | $10.2bn | $2.2bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +14.1% | +25.6% |
| What it tracks | Fidelity High Dividend Index | Nuveen ESG USA Large-Cap Value Index |
| Holdings in common | 19% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 33.8% | 28.6% |
| Below its high | 3.6%, high on Aug 13, 2026 | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, FDVV and NULV hold 19% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026.
half
19% in common
On the same fields
FDVV and NULV on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About FDVV
FDVV tracks an index of High Dividend. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +14.1% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 95 positions, with the top ten at 33.8%. It sat 3.6% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.
About NULV
NULV tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +25.6% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.26% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 101 positions, with the top ten at 28.6%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, FDVV or NULV?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FDVV returned +14.1% and NULV +25.6%.
- Which is cheaper, FDVV or NULV?
- FDVV is cheaper, by 0.11 percentage points a year. That is about $11 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, FDVV against NULV, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fdvv-vs-nulv
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). FDVV against NULV. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fdvv-vs-nulv
[FDVV against NULV (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fdvv-vs-nulv)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.