FBCG vs TCHP: Differences, Returns & Fees
FBCG and TCHP hold 59% of their weight in the same names, and FBCG returned +14.0% over the year. Net assets: $7.6bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF, and $2.2bn on Oct 20, 2026 for T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth ETF.
Both cost 0.57% a year; their one-year returns differ by 11.6 points.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| FBCG | TCHP | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.57% | 0.57% |
| Net assets, FBCG as of Sep 30, 2026 and TCHP as of Oct 20, 2026 | $7.6bn | $2.2bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +14.0% | +2.4% |
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | No index, actively managed |
| Holdings in common | 59% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 57.2% | 56.7% |
| Below its high | 5.8%, high on Oct 6, 2026 | 5.1%, high on Jun 1, 2026 |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026.
FBCG and TCHP are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 20, 2026 FBCG returned +14.0% and TCHP +2.4% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 11.6 points.
- Number of holdings. FBCG holds 230 positions and TCHP holds 66.
- Size. FBCG has $7.6bn in net assets and TCHP $2.2bn (net assets, FBCG as of Sep 30, 2026 and TCHP as of Oct 20, 2026); FBCG is 3.5 times larger.
Data as of Oct 20, 2026. The differences are picked by a fixed rule, in a fixed order; the PDF prints it. Page 2 has the returns, overlap, risks and sources.
Take this comparison to a client
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
Not advice. The brief uses the figures on this page, with the data date and a report id. Saved comparisons are listed on your saved page; privacy.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, FBCG and TCHP hold 59% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026.
half
59% in common
On the same fields
FBCG and TCHP on the fields both publish, as of Oct 20, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About FBCG
FBCG is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +14.0% with distributions reinvested, against +15.9% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.57% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 85% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 230 positions, with the top ten at 57.2%. It sat 5.8% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 20, 2026.
About TCHP
TCHP is actively managed and tracks no index. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 66 positions, with the top ten at 56.7%. It sat 5.1% below its high of Jun 1, 2026 on Oct 20, 2026.
Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +2.4% with distributions reinvested, against +4.0% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Growth Index.
Questions people ask
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, FBCG against TCHP, data as of Oct 20, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fbcg-vs-tchp
ETFIQ. (Oct 20, 2026). FBCG against TCHP. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fbcg-vs-tchp
[FBCG against TCHP (ETFIQ, Oct 20, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fbcg-vs-tchp)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.