Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

FBCG vs FTEC: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, FBCG returned +9.5% to FTEC's +25.0%; 47% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about FBCG and FTEC

Net assets on Sep 30, 2026: $7.6bn for Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF and $22.1bn for Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF.

At a glance
+9.5%
FBCG total return, 1 year
+25.0%
FTEC total return, 1 year
0.57%
FBCG expense ratio
0.08%
FTEC expense ratio

Pair scorecard

FTEC costs 0.49 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 15.5 points; FTEC is 2.9 times larger.

FBCG vs FTEC: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureFBCGFTEC
Return
Total return, 1 year+9.5%+25.0%
Drawdown
Below its high5.7%, high on Oct 6, 20264.9%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedMSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.57%0.08%
Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026$7.6bn$22.1bn
Holdings
Holdings in common47%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund57.2%62.2%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Jun 12, 2020 to Oct 23, 2026 · 332 weekly returns
FBCG FTEC
Return
Total return edge FTEC +197.7% +280.5%
Annualized edge FTEC +18.6% +23.3%
Price return edge FTEC +197.2% +264.0%
Risk
Volatility edge Tie 23.9% 23.6%
Max drawdown edge FTEC −42.6% −34.1%
Downside capture 126.3% 100.0%
Beta 1.39 1.00
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge FTEC 0.71 0.87
Sortino edge FTEC 1.09 1.37
Treynor 0.121 0.199
Calmar edge FTEC 0.44 0.68
Against the benchmark
Alpha −2.6% a year −0.1% a year
Alpha t-stat −0.70 −0.70
Information ratio 0.26 −0.19
Tracking error 11.2% 0.7%

Each against its own benchmark: FBCG against VOO, Jun 12, 2020 to Oct 23, 2026; FTEC against VGT, Nov 1, 2013 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

FTEC returned more: +280.5% to +197.7%. FBCG and FTEC swung about the same: 23.9% and 23.6%. FTEC fell less at its worst: −34.1% to −42.6%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: FBCG vs FTEC: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureFBCGFTECEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+197.7%+280.5%FTECPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+18.6%+23.3%FTECTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+197.2%+264.0%FTECPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility23.9%23.6%TieSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation15.5%15.1%FTEC (slight)Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−42.6%−34.1%FTECDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture168.9%99.7%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture126.3%100.0%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.391.00Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.851.00Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.710.87FTECReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino1.091.37FTECReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1210.199Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.440.68FTECAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkVOOVGTThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha−2.6% a year−0.1% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat−0.70−0.70Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−9.9% to +4.7%−0.5% to +0.2%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio0.26−0.19Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error11.2%0.7%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 332 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

47%

By the books each fund has filed, FBCG and FTEC hold 47% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

47% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first FBCG FTEC
NVIDIA CORP 14.90% 17.09%
APPLE INC 9.31% 16.21%
MICROSOFT CORP 4.94% 10.93%
BROADCOM INC 4.38% 4.20%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC 1.97% 3.82%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES INC 1.06% 3.18%
WESTERN DIGITAL CORP 1.59% 0.83%
SANDISK CORP 1.28% 0.76%
MARVELL TECHNOLOGY INC 0.97% 0.71%
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS PLC 0.64% 0.82%
CROWDSTRIKE HOLDINGS INC 0.61% 0.83%
PALO ALTO NETWORKS INC 0.54% 1.17%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in FBCG
ALPHABET INC 9.27%
AMAZON.COM INC 5.86%
ELI LILLY and CO 2.71%
META PLATFORMS INC 2.31%
TESLA INC 1.28%
TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MFG CO LTD 1.17%
MASTERCARD INC 0.85%
SHARKNINJA INC 0.80%
Only in FTEC
Cisco Systems Inc 1.92%
Texas Instruments Inc 1.07%
International Business Machines Corp 0.88%
Analog Devices Inc 0.78%
QUALCOMM Inc 0.68%
Fortinet Inc 0.48%
Adobe Inc 0.46%
Accenture PLC 0.45%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

FBCG Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF FTEC Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Actively managed Tracks the MSCI Information Technology
Total return, 1 year +9.5% +25.0%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.7% (VOO) +24.7% (VGT)
Gap to its benchmark −4.2 pts vs VOO +0.3 pts vs VGT
Expense ratio 0.57% 0.08%
Already in the S&P 500 85.3% 87.8%
Holdings 230 281
Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026 $7.6bn $22.1bn

FBCG and FTEC on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-3034F1873F

FBCG and FTEC do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

  1. What each follows. FBCG follows No index, actively managed and FTEC follows MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 47% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Jul 31, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 FBCG returned +9.5% and FTEC +25.0% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 15.5 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

The week's ETF fund flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
FBCG

FBCG is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +9.5% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.57% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 85% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 230 positions, with the top ten at 57.2%. It sat 5.7% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

FTEC

FTEC tracks the MSCI Information Technology. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +25.0% with distributions reinvested, against +24.7% for its benchmark, the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 88% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 281 positions, with the top ten at 62.2%. It sat 4.9% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FBCG or FTEC?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FBCG returned +9.5% and FTEC +25.0%.
Which is cheaper, FBCG or FTEC?
FTEC is cheaper, by 0.49 percentage points a year. That is about $49 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do FBCG and FTEC overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 85% of FBCG and 88% of FTEC by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, FBCG against FTEC, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fbcg-vs-ftec

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.