Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

FBCG vs VGT: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, FBCG returned +9.5% to VGT's +24.7%; 45% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about FBCG and VGT

Net assets on Sep 30, 2026: $7.6bn for Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF and $154.5bn for Vanguard Information Tech ETF.

At a glance
+9.5%
FBCG total return, 1 year
+24.7%
VGT total return, 1 year
0.57%
FBCG expense ratio
0.09%
VGT expense ratio

Pair scorecard

VGT costs 0.48 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 15.2 points; VGT is far larger, $154.5bn against $7.6bn.

FBCG vs VGT: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureFBCGVGT
Return
Total return, 1 year+9.5%+24.7%
Drawdown
Below its high5.7%, high on Oct 6, 20264.8%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedMSCI US Investable Market Index (IMI)/Information Technology 25/50
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.57%0.09%
Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026$7.6bn$154.5bn
Holdings
Holdings in common45%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund57.2%63.6%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Jun 12, 2020 to Oct 23, 2026 · 332 weekly returns
FBCG VGT
Return
Total return edge VGT +197.7% +277.2%
Annualized edge VGT +18.6% +23.1%
Price return edge VGT +197.2% +260.8%
Risk
Volatility edge Tie 23.9% 23.6%
Max drawdown edge VGT −42.6% −34.1%
Downside capture 126.3% 99.9%
Beta 1.39 1.00
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge VGT 0.71 0.87
Sortino edge VGT 1.09 1.36
Treynor 0.121 0.201
Calmar edge VGT 0.44 0.68
Against the benchmark
Alpha −2.6% a year +0.1% a year
Alpha t-stat −0.70 0.80
Information ratio 0.26 0.19
Tracking error 11.2% 0.7%

Each against its own benchmark: FBCG against VOO, Jun 12, 2020 to Oct 23, 2026; VGT against FTEC, Nov 1, 2013 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

VGT returned more: +277.2% to +197.7%. FBCG and VGT swung about the same: 23.9% and 23.6%. VGT fell less at its worst: −34.1% to −42.6%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: FBCG vs VGT: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureFBCGVGTEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+197.7%+277.2%VGTPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+18.6%+23.1%VGTTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+197.2%+260.8%VGTPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility23.9%23.6%TieSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation15.5%15.1%VGT (slight)Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−42.6%−34.1%VGTDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture168.9%100.0%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture126.3%99.9%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.391.00Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.851.00Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.710.87VGTReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino1.091.36VGTReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1210.201Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.440.68VGTAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkVOOFTECThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha−2.6% a year+0.1% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat−0.700.80Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−9.9% to +4.7%−0.2% to +0.5%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio0.260.19Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error11.2%0.7%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 332 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

45%

By the books each fund has filed, FBCG and VGT hold 45% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

45% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first FBCG VGT
NVIDIA CORP 14.90% 17.58%
APPLE INC 9.31% 15.91%
MICROSOFT CORP 4.94% 11.16%
BROADCOM INC 4.38% 4.11%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC 1.97% 4.45%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES INC 1.06% 3.67%
MARVELL TECHNOLOGY INC 0.97% 0.88%
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS PLC 0.64% 0.79%
WESTERN DIGITAL CORP 1.59% 0.61%
CROWDSTRIKE HOLDINGS INC 0.61% 1.02%
PALO ALTO NETWORKS INC 0.54% 1.24%
LAM RESEARCH CORP 0.49% 1.55%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in FBCG
ALPHABET INC 9.27%
AMAZON.COM INC 5.86%
ELI LILLY and CO 2.71%
META PLATFORMS INC 2.31%
SANDISK CORP 1.28%
TESLA INC 1.28%
TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MFG CO LTD 1.17%
APPLOVIN CORP 1.16%
Only in VGT
Cisco Systems Inc 1.60%
Texas Instruments Inc 0.98%
Sandisk Corp 0.97%
Amphenol Corp 0.80%
International Business Machines Corp 0.77%
QUALCOMM Inc 0.76%
Analog Devices Inc 0.75%
Fortinet Inc 0.46%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

FBCG Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF VGT Vanguard Information Tech ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Actively managed Tracks an index of Information technology
Total return, 1 year +9.5% +24.7%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.7% (VOO) +25.0% (FTEC)
Gap to its benchmark −4.2 pts vs VOO −0.3 pts vs FTEC
Expense ratio 0.57% 0.09%
Already in the S&P 500 85.3% 86.8%
Holdings 230 320
Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026 $7.6bn $154.5bn

FBCG and VGT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-C8E18F6581

FBCG and VGT do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

  1. What each follows. FBCG follows No index, actively managed and VGT follows MSCI US Investable Market Index (IMI)/Information Technology 25/50.
  2. Holdings in common. 45% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 FBCG returned +9.5% and VGT +24.7% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 15.2 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

The week's ETF fund flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
FBCG

FBCG is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +9.5% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.57% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 85% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 230 positions, with the top ten at 57.2%. It sat 5.7% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

VGT

VGT tracks an index of Information technology. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +24.7% with distributions reinvested, against +25.0% for its benchmark, the MSCI US Investable Market Index (IMI)/Information Technology 25/50. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 320 positions, with the top ten at 63.6%. It sat 4.8% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FBCG or VGT?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FBCG returned +9.5% and VGT +24.7%.
Which is cheaper, FBCG or VGT?
VGT is cheaper, by 0.48 percentage points a year. That is about $48 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do FBCG and VGT overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 85% of FBCG and 87% of VGT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, FBCG against VGT, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fbcg-vs-vgt

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.