Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

EZU vs XLF: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, EZU returned +7.1% to XLF's +7.6%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about EZU and XLF

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $9.2bn for iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF and $51.6bn for State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF.

At a glance
+7.1%
EZU total return, 1 year
+7.6%
XLF total return, 1 year
0.50%
EZU expense ratio
0.08%
XLF expense ratio

Pair scorecard

XLF costs 0.42 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.5 points; XLF is 5.6 times larger.

EZU vs XLF: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureEZUXLF
Return
Total return, 1 year+7.1%+7.6%
Drawdown
Below its high8.7%, high on Aug 14, 20263.8%, high on Sep 3, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksMSCI EMU IndexFinancial Select Sector Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.50%0.08%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$9.2bn$51.6bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund30.5%57.4%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, EZU and XLF hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first EZU XLF
Only in one fund ↓
Only in EZU
ASML HOLDING 8.79%
SAP 3.33%
SIEMENS N AG 2.97%
ALLIANZ 2.55%
BANCO SANTANDER 2.48%
TOTALENERGIES 2.48%
IBERDROLA 2.10%
SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC 2.05%
Only in XLF
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC CL B 12.84%
JPMORGAN CHASE + CO 11.33%
VISA INC CLASS A SHARES 8.69%
MASTERCARD INC A 6.26%
BANK OF AMERICA CORP 4.18%
GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC 3.37%
WELLS FARGO + CO 3.17%
MORGAN STANLEY 2.83%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

EZU iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF XLF State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks the MSCI Eurozone Tracks an index of Financials
Total return, 1 year +7.1% +7.6%
Its benchmark over the same days +14.3% (ACWX) not measured
Gap to its benchmark −7.2 pts vs ACWX not measured
Expense ratio 0.50% 0.08%
Already in the S&P 500 0.0% 99.8%
Holdings 216 77
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $9.2bn $51.6bn

EZU and XLF on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

EZU and XLF flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
EZU

EZU tracks the MSCI Eurozone. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +7.1% with distributions reinvested, against +14.3% for its benchmark, the MSCI ACWI ex USA Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.50% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 216 positions, with the top ten at 30.5%. It sat 8.7% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

XLF

XLF tracks an index of Financials. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +7.6% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 77 positions, with the top ten at 57.4%. It sat 3.8% below its high of Sep 3, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, EZU or XLF?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EZU returned +7.1% and XLF +7.6%.
Which is cheaper, EZU or XLF?
XLF is cheaper, by 0.42 percentage points a year. That is about $42 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do EZU and XLF overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of EZU and 100% of XLF by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, EZU against XLF, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ezu-vs-xlf

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.