Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

EWJ vs MAGS: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, EWJ returned +18.1% to MAGS's +5.8%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about EWJ and MAGS

Net assets on Oct 28, 2026: $23.9bn for iShares MSCI Japan ETF and $5.5bn for Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF.

At a glance
+18.1%
EWJ total return, 1 year
+5.8%
MAGS total return, 1 year
0.49%
EWJ expense ratio
0.30%
MAGS expense ratio

Pair scorecard

MAGS costs 0.19 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 12.3 points; EWJ is 4.3 times larger.

EWJ vs MAGS: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureEWJMAGS
Return
Total return, 1 year+18.1%+5.8%
Drawdown
Below its high4.4%, high on Oct 6, 20264.1%, high on Oct 13, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksMSCI Japan IndexNo index, actively managed
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.49%0.30%
Net assets$23.9bn$5.5bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund29.5%29.3%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Apr 21, 2023 to Oct 23, 2026 · 183 weekly returns
EWJ MAGS
Return
Total return edge MAGS +75.3% +189.1%
Annualized edge MAGS +17.3% +35.2%
Price return edge MAGS +59.5% +181.4%
Risk
Volatility edge EWJ 18.8% 24.0%
Max drawdown edge EWJ −13.8% −26.6%
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge MAGS 0.70 1.19
Sortino edge MAGS 1.02 1.97
Calmar edge MAGS (slight) 1.26 1.33
Reading

MAGS returned more: +189.1% to +75.3%. EWJ swung less: 18.8% to 24.0%. EWJ fell less at its worst: −13.8% to −26.6%.

Full scorecard

9 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: EWJ vs MAGS: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureEWJMAGSEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+75.3%+189.1%MAGSPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+17.3%+35.2%MAGSTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+59.5%+181.4%MAGSPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility18.8%24.0%EWJSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation12.9%14.5%EWJLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−13.8%−26.6%EWJDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.701.19MAGSReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino1.021.97MAGSReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Calmar1.261.33MAGS (slight)Annualized return divided by the max drawdown.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 183 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, EWJ and MAGS hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first EWJ MAGS
Only in one fund ↓
Only in EWJ
MITSUBISHI UFJ FINANCIAL GROUP 4.40%
TOYOTA MOTOR 3.59%
ADVANTEST 3.03%
HITACHI 3.03%
RECRUIT HOLDINGS LTD 3.03%
SONY GROUP 2.89%
SUMITOMO MITSUI FINANCIAL GROUP 2.83%
TOKYO ELECTRON 2.55%
Only in MAGS
Roundhill Ultra Short Duration 6.83%
NVIDIA Corp 3.52%
Apple Inc 3.49%
Amazon.com Inc 3.48%
Tesla Inc 3.45%
Microsoft Corp 3.07%
Meta Platforms Inc 3.04%
Alphabet Inc 2.45%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

EWJ iShares MSCI Japan ETF MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks the MSCI Japan Actively managed
Total return, 1 year +18.1% +5.8%
Its benchmark over the same days +14.3% (ACWX) not measured
Gap to its benchmark +3.8 pts vs ACWX not measured
Expense ratio 0.49% 0.30%
Already in the S&P 500 0.0% 22.5%
Holdings 169 8
Net assets $23.9bn $5.5bn

EWJ and MAGS on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief

No client brief for this pair: the two funds' holdings are dated 119 days apart.

Alert

EWJ and MAGS flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
EWJ

EWJ tracks the MSCI Japan. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +18.1% with distributions reinvested, against +14.3% for its benchmark, the MSCI ACWI ex USA Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.49% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 169 positions, with the top ten at 29.5%. It sat 4.4% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

MAGS

MAGS is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +5.8% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.30% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 22% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 8 positions, with the top ten at 29.3%. It sat 4.1% below its high of Oct 13, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, EWJ or MAGS?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EWJ returned +18.1% and MAGS +5.8%.
Which is cheaper, EWJ or MAGS?
MAGS is cheaper, by 0.19 percentage points a year. That is about $19 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do EWJ and MAGS overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of EWJ and 22% of MAGS by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, EWJ against MAGS, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ewj-vs-mags

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.