Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

EZU vs MAGS: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, EZU returned +7.1% to MAGS's +5.8%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about EZU and MAGS

Net assets: $9.2bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF, and $5.5bn on Oct 28, 2026 for Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF.

At a glance
+7.1%
EZU total return, 1 year
+5.8%
MAGS total return, 1 year
0.50%
EZU expense ratio
0.30%
MAGS expense ratio

Pair scorecard

MAGS costs 0.20 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 1.3 points; EZU is 1.7 times larger.

EZU vs MAGS: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureEZUMAGS
Return
Total return, 1 year+7.1%+5.8%
Drawdown
Below its high8.7%, high on Aug 14, 20264.1%, high on Oct 13, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksMSCI EMU IndexNo index, actively managed
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.50%0.30%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$9.2bn$5.5bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund30.5%29.3%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, EZU and MAGS hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first EZU MAGS
Only in one fund ↓
Only in EZU
ASML HOLDING 8.79%
SAP 3.33%
SIEMENS N AG 2.97%
ALLIANZ 2.55%
BANCO SANTANDER 2.48%
TOTALENERGIES 2.48%
IBERDROLA 2.10%
SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC 2.05%
Only in MAGS
Roundhill Ultra Short Duration 6.83%
NVIDIA Corp 3.52%
Apple Inc 3.49%
Amazon.com Inc 3.48%
Tesla Inc 3.45%
Microsoft Corp 3.07%
Meta Platforms Inc 3.04%
Alphabet Inc 2.45%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

EZU iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks the MSCI Eurozone Actively managed
Total return, 1 year +7.1% +5.8%
Its benchmark over the same days +14.3% (ACWX) not measured
Gap to its benchmark −7.2 pts vs ACWX not measured
Expense ratio 0.50% 0.30%
Already in the S&P 500 0.0% 22.5%
Holdings 216 8
Net assets, EZU as of Oct 27, 2026 and MAGS as of Oct 28, 2026 $9.2bn $5.5bn

EZU and MAGS on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

EZU and MAGS flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
EZU

EZU tracks the MSCI Eurozone. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +7.1% with distributions reinvested, against +14.3% for its benchmark, the MSCI ACWI ex USA Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.50% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 216 positions, with the top ten at 30.5%. It sat 8.7% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

MAGS

MAGS is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +5.8% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.30% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 22% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 8 positions, with the top ten at 29.3%. It sat 4.1% below its high of Oct 13, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, EZU or MAGS?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EZU returned +7.1% and MAGS +5.8%.
Which is cheaper, EZU or MAGS?
MAGS is cheaper, by 0.20 percentage points a year. That is about $20 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do EZU and MAGS overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of EZU and 22% of MAGS by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, EZU against MAGS, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ezu-vs-mags

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.