ESGU vs LCTU: Differences, Returns & Fees

ESGU and LCTU hold 70% of their weight in the same names, and ESGU returned +17.3% over the year. Net assets on Oct 9, 2026: $18.3bn for iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA ETF and $1.2bn for iShares U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness Aware Active ETF.

Both cost 0.15% a year; their one-year returns differ by 2.0 points; ESGU is 15.2 times larger.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

ESGU vs LCTU: Differences, Returns & Fees
ESGULCTU
Expense ratio0.15%0.15%
Net assets$18.3bn$1.2bn
Total return, 1 year+17.3%+15.3%
What it tracksMSCI USA Extended ESG Focus IndexNo index, actively managed
Holdings in common70%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund37.8%35.2%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 9, 2026.

+17.3%
ESGU total return, 1 year
+15.3%
LCTU total return, 1 year
0.15%
ESGU expense ratio
0.15%
LCTU expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, ESGU and LCTU hold 70% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Oct 9, 2026.

half

70% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding ESGU LCTU
NVIDIA 7.87% 7.91%
APPLE 7.25% 7.14%
MICROSOFT 5.67% 5.12%
AMAZON.COM INC 3.69% 3.18%
META PLATFORMS CLASS A 2.16% 2.30%
BROADCOM INC 2.46% 2.05%
ALPHABET CLASS A 1.93% 2.48%
ALPHABET CLASS C 3.50% 1.90%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY 1.69% 1.60%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES 1.50% 1.55%
TESLA INC 1.60% 1.49%
ELI LILLY 1.37% 1.33%
Only in ESGU
PROCTER & GAMBLE 0.60%
TEXAS INSTRUMENT INC 0.38%
LINDE PLC 0.37%
AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING INC 0.35%
METLIFE 0.34%
WILLIAMS 0.34%
LOWES COMPANIES INC 0.32%
STERIS 0.32%
Only in LCTU
PEPSICO 0.86%
WALMART 0.86%
REPUBLIC SERVICES INC 0.55%
ASSURANT INC 0.50%
EMERSON ELECTRIC 0.44%
PACCAR INC 0.42%
LIVE NATION ENTERTAINMENT 0.41%
KKR AND CO INC 0.35%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

ESGU
iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA ETF
LCTU
iShares U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness Aware Active ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index Actively managed
Total return, 1 year +17.3% +15.3%
Its benchmark over the same days not published +16.6% (IWB)
Gap to its benchmark not available −1.4 pts vs IWB
Expense ratio 0.15% 0.15%
Already in the S&P 500 97.4% 93.4%
Holdings 269 322
Net assets $18.3bn $1.2bn

ESGU and LCTU on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

About ESGU

ESGU tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +17.3% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 269 positions, with the top ten at 37.8%.

About LCTU

LCTU is actively managed and tracks no index. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 93% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 322 positions, with the top ten at 35.2%.

Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +15.3% with distributions reinvested, against +16.6% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Index.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, ESGU or LCTU?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ESGU returned +17.3% and LCTU +15.3%.
Which is cheaper, ESGU or LCTU?
Neither: ESGU and LCTU both charge 0.15% a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do ESGU and LCTU overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 97% of ESGU and 93% of LCTU by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, ESGU against LCTU, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/esgu-vs-lctu

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.