Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
EQTY vs RWL: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, EQTY returned +18.0% to RWL's +25.3%; 14% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about EQTY and RWL
Net assets: $1.4bn on Jul 31, 2026 for Kovitz Core Equity ETF, and $10.4bn on Nov 3, 2026 for Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF.
Pair scorecard
RWL costs 0.60 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 7.3 points.
| Measure | EQTY | RWL |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +18.0% | +25.3% |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | S&P 500 Revenue-Weighted Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.99% | 0.39% |
| Net assets, EQTY as of Jul 31, 2026 and RWL as of Nov 3, 2026 | $1.4bn | $10.4bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 14% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 41.9% | 24.5% |
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, EQTY and RWL hold 14% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Nov 3, 2026.
half
14% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
EQTY and RWL on the fields both publish, as of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
Client brief:
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
EQTY
EQTY is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 it returned +18.0% with distributions reinvested, against +14.8% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.99% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 85% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 39 positions, with the top ten at 41.9%.
RWL
RWL tracks an index. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 it returned +25.3% with distributions reinvested, against +14.8% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.39% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Nov 3, 2026, 98% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 504 positions, with the top ten at 24.5%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, EQTY or RWL?
- In the year to Nov 4, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EQTY returned +18.0% and RWL +25.3%.
- Which is cheaper, EQTY or RWL?
- RWL is cheaper, by 0.60 percentage points a year. That is about $60 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, EQTY against RWL, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/eqty-vs-rwl
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). EQTY against RWL. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/eqty-vs-rwl
[EQTY against RWL (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/eqty-vs-rwl)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.