Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

EEM vs TMAR: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, EEM returned +16.3% to TMAR's +15.6%, and EEM charges 0.72% to TMAR's 0.95%.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about EEM and TMAR

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $29.1bn for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF and $15m for FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - March.

At a glance
+16.3%
EEM total return, 1 year
+15.6%
TMAR total return, 1 year
0.72%
EEM expense ratio
0.95%
TMAR expense ratio

Pair scorecard

EEM costs 0.23 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.7 points; EEM is far larger, $29.1bn against $15m.

EEM vs TMAR: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureEEMTMAR
Return
Total return, 1 year+16.3%+15.6%
Drawdown
Below its high10.8%, high on Jun 22, 2026
Index fall to the buffer12.4%
Fund price fall to the buffer11.6%
Benchmark
What it tracksMSCI Emerging Markets IndexEEM
The outcome period
Room to the cap14.8%
Buffer left, in index points10.0% of 10.0%
Days left in the period142
Period endsMar 19, 2027
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.72%0.95%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$29.1bn$15m
Holdings
Holdings in commonnot published
In the S&P 500, by weight0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund37.2%

Method

Side by side

EEM iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF TMAR FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - March
Where it sits Stock ETF Buffer ETF
What it is Tracks an index of Emerging markets Defined outcome, 10% on EEM
Total return, 1 year +16.3% +15.6%
Its benchmark over the same days not measured +14.1% (EEM)
Gap to its benchmark not measured +1.5 pts vs EEM
Expense ratio 0.72% 0.95%
Holdings 1186 not read by ETFIQ
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $29.1bn $15m

EEM and TMAR on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

EEM and TMAR flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
EEM

EEM tracks an index of Emerging markets. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +16.3% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.72% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,186 positions, with the top ten at 37.2%. It sat 10.8% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

TMAR

From its price on Oct 28, 2026, the fund can gain about 14.8% more before it reaches its cap. The fund's price can fall 11.6% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's number. In index terms, EEM can fall 12.4% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 10.0% of the 10.0% buffer still sits below today's EEM level. 142 days remained on Oct 28, 2026. On Mar 19, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.

Questions people ask

Are EEM and TMAR in the same category?
EEM is a stock ETF and TMAR is a buffer ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
Which returned more over the last year, EEM or TMAR?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EEM returned +16.3% and TMAR +15.6%.
Which is cheaper, EEM or TMAR?
EEM is cheaper, by 0.23 percentage points a year. That is about $23 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, EEM against TMAR, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/eem-vs-tmar

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.