Which returned more over the last year, EEM or EOCT?

In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EEM returned +32.3% and EOCT returned +16.1%, so EEM returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, EEM or EOCT?

EEM charges 0.72% a year and EOCT charges 0.89%, so EEM is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Are EEM and EOCT the same kind of fund?

No. EEM is an index ETF and EOCT is a buffer ETF, so they are built for different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and what each actually holds.

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

EEM vs EOCT: how they differ

Over the year EEM returned more, +32.3% against +16.1%, and EEM charges 0.72% against 0.89%.

iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF and Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - Oct.

EEM and EOCT on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	EEM iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF	EOCT Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - Oct
Where it sits	Core index fund	Buffer ETF
Issuer	iShares	Innovator
What it is	Emerging markets	Defined outcome, 15% on EEM
Total return, 1 year	+32.3%	+16.1%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+32.3%
Gap to the S&P 500	+14.8 pts	−16.1 pts
Expense ratio	0.72%	0.89%
Holdings	965	not filed

EEM in plain words

EEM is an index equity fund tracking the Emerging markets. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +32.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.72% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 965 positions, with the top ten at 38.3%. It sat 4.7% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

EOCT in plain words

EEM had already risen past this fund's cap of +15.2% for the period on Sep 13, 2026, so in index terms there is no more upside to collect. The fund's own price can still drift up to about 0.3% as the period runs out. The fund's price can fall 13.0% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's figure. In index terms, EEM can fall 21.3% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 15.0% of the 15.0% buffer still sits below today's EEM level. 19 days remained on Sep 13, 2026. On Sep 30, 2026 the period ends and a new cap is set.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, EEM or EOCT?: In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EEM returned +32.3% and EOCT returned +16.1%, so EEM returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, EEM or EOCT?: EEM charges 0.72% a year and EOCT charges 0.89%, so EEM is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Are EEM and EOCT the same kind of fund?: No. EEM is an index ETF and EOCT is a buffer ETF, so they are built for different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and what each actually holds.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

EEM against EOCT, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, EEM against EOCT, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/eem-vs-eoct Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources