Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

EOCT vs IEMG: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, EOCT returned +9.4% to IEMG's +15.3%, and IEMG charges 0.09% to EOCT's 0.89%.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about EOCT and IEMG

Net assets: $125m on Oct 28, 2026 for Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - Oct, and $150.4bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF.

At a glance
+9.4%
EOCT total return, 1 year
+15.3%
IEMG total return, 1 year
0.89%
EOCT expense ratio
0.09%
IEMG expense ratio

Pair scorecard

IEMG costs 0.80 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 5.9 points; IEMG is far larger, $150.4bn against $124m.

EOCT vs IEMG: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureEOCTIEMG
Return
Total return, 1 year+9.4%+15.3%
Drawdown
Below its high10.1%, high on Jun 22, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksEEMMSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index (IMI)
The outcome period
Room to the cap26.0%
Buffer left, in index points10.0% of 15.0%
Days left in the period337
Period endsSep 30, 2027
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.89%0.09%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$124m$150.4bn
Holdings
Holdings in commonnot published
In the S&P 500, by weight0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund32.7%

Method

Side by side

EOCT Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - Oct IEMG iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
Where it sits Buffer ETF Stock ETF
What it is Defined outcome, 15% on EEM Tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets
Total return, 1 year +9.4% +15.3%
Its benchmark over the same days +14.1% (EEM) +16.3% (EEM)
Gap to its benchmark −4.7 pts vs EEM −1.0 pts vs EEM
Expense ratio 0.89% 0.09%
Holdings not read by ETFIQ 2857
Net assets, EOCT as of Oct 28, 2026 and IEMG as of Oct 27, 2026 $125m $150.4bn

EOCT and IEMG on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

EOCT and IEMG flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
EOCT

From its price on Oct 28, 2026, the fund can gain about 26.0% more before it reaches its cap. Protection left, in index points: 10.0% of the 15.0% buffer still sits below today's EEM level. 337 days remained on Oct 28, 2026. On Sep 30, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.

IEMG

IEMG tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +15.3% with distributions reinvested, against +16.3% for its benchmark, the MSCI Emerging Markets Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2,857 positions, with the top ten at 32.7%. It sat 10.1% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Are EOCT and IEMG in the same category?
EOCT is a buffer ETF and IEMG is a stock ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
Which returned more over the last year, EOCT or IEMG?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EOCT returned +9.4% and IEMG +15.3%.
Which is cheaper, EOCT or IEMG?
IEMG is cheaper, by 0.80 percentage points a year. That is about $80 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, EOCT against IEMG, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/eoct-vs-iemg

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.