Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

EEM vs EJAN: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, EEM returned +16.3% to EJAN's +10.7%, and EEM charges 0.72% to EJAN's 0.89%.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about EEM and EJAN

Net assets: $29.1bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF, and $143m on Oct 28, 2026 for Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - Jan.

At a glance
+16.3%
EEM total return, 1 year
+10.7%
EJAN total return, 1 year
0.72%
EEM expense ratio
0.89%
EJAN expense ratio

Pair scorecard

EEM costs 0.17 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 5.6 points; EEM is far larger, $29.1bn against $142m.

EEM vs EJAN: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureEEMEJAN
Return
Total return, 1 year+16.3%+10.7%
Drawdown
Below its high10.8%, high on Jun 22, 2026
Index fall to the buffer13.8%
Fund price fall to the buffer9.4%
Benchmark
What it tracksMSCI Emerging Markets IndexEEM
The outcome period
Buffer left, in index points15.0% of 15.0%
Days left in the period64
Period endsDec 31, 2026
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.72%0.89%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$29.1bn$142m
Holdings
Holdings in commonnot published
In the S&P 500, by weight0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund37.2%

Method

Side by side

EEM iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF EJAN Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - Jan
Where it sits Stock ETF Buffer ETF
What it is Tracks an index of Emerging markets Defined outcome, 15% on EEM
Total return, 1 year +16.3% +10.7%
Its benchmark over the same days not measured +14.1% (EEM)
Gap to its benchmark not measured −3.4 pts vs EEM
Expense ratio 0.72% 0.89%
Holdings 1186 not read by ETFIQ
Net assets, EEM as of Oct 27, 2026 and EJAN as of Oct 28, 2026 $29.1bn $143m

EEM and EJAN on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

EEM and EJAN flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
EEM

EEM tracks an index of Emerging markets. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +16.3% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.72% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,186 positions, with the top ten at 37.2%. It sat 10.8% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

EJAN

EEM had already risen past this fund's cap of +14.4% for the period on Oct 28, 2026, so in index terms there is no more upside to collect. The fund's own price can still drift up to about 3.7% as the period runs out.

The fund's price can fall 9.4% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's number. In index terms, EEM can fall 13.8% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 15.0% of the 15.0% buffer still sits below today's EEM level. 64 days remained on Oct 28, 2026. On Dec 31, 2026 the period ends and a new cap is set.

Questions people ask

Are EEM and EJAN in the same category?
EEM is a stock ETF and EJAN is a buffer ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
Which returned more over the last year, EEM or EJAN?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EEM returned +16.3% and EJAN +10.7%.
Which is cheaper, EEM or EJAN?
EEM is cheaper, by 0.17 percentage points a year. That is about $17 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, EEM against EJAN, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/eem-vs-ejan

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.