Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
EEM vs EMJL: Differences, Returns & Fees
EEM and EMJL are measured over different days, and EMJL charges 0.30% to EEM's 0.72%.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about EEM and EMJL
Net assets: $29.1bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF, and $1.4m on Oct 28, 2026 for Corgi Emerging Markets Equities 15% Structured Buffer ETF - July Series.
Pair scorecard
EMJL costs 0.42 points a year less; EEM is far larger, $29.1bn against $1.4m.
| Measure | EEM | EMJL |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +16.3% | not published |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 10.8%, high on Jun 22, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | MSCI Emerging Markets Index | EEM |
| The outcome period | ||
| Buffer left, in index points | 9.0% of 15.0% | |
| Days left in the period | 246 | |
| Period ends | Jun 30, 2027 | |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.72% | 0.30% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 | $29.1bn | $1.4m |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | not published | |
| In the S&P 500, by weight | 0% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 37.2% | |
Risk and return
Jul 10, 2026 to Oct 23, 2026 · 15 weekly returnsEEM and EMJL returned about the same: −7.3% and −7.3%. EMJL fell less at its worst: −7.4% to −9.7%.
Full scorecard
3 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | EEM | EMJL | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | −7.3% | −7.3% | Tie | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Price return | −7.3% | −7.3% | Tie | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Max drawdown | −9.7% | −7.4% | EMJL | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 15 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
Side by side
EEM and EMJL on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
No client brief for this pair: ETFIQ prints no one-year total return for EMJL.
EEM
EEM tracks an index of Emerging markets. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +16.3% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.72% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,186 positions, with the top ten at 37.2%. It sat 10.8% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
EMJL
Protection left, in index points: 9.0% of the 15.0% buffer still sits below today's EEM level. 246 days remained on Oct 27, 2026. On Jun 30, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.
Questions people ask
- Are EEM and EMJL in the same category?
- EEM is a stock ETF and EMJL is a buffer ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
- Which is cheaper, EEM or EMJL?
- EMJL is cheaper, by 0.42 percentage points a year. That is about $42 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, EEM against EMJL, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/eem-vs-emjl
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). EEM against EMJL. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/eem-vs-emjl
[EEM against EMJL (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/eem-vs-emjl)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.