Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

TMAR vs VWO: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, TMAR returned +15.6% to VWO's +4.8%, and VWO charges 0.06% to TMAR's 0.95%.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about TMAR and VWO

Net assets: $15m on Oct 27, 2026 for FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - March, and $125.4bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF.

At a glance
+15.6%
TMAR total return, 1 year
+4.8%
VWO total return, 1 year
0.95%
TMAR expense ratio
0.06%
VWO expense ratio

Pair scorecard

VWO costs 0.89 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 10.8 points.

TMAR vs VWO: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureTMARVWO
Return
Total return, 1 year+15.6%+4.8%
Drawdown
Below its high7.0%, high on Sep 4, 2026
Index fall to the buffer12.4%
Fund price fall to the buffer11.6%
Benchmark
What it tracksEEMFTSE Emerging Markets All Cap China A Inclusion Index
The outcome period
Room to the cap14.8%
Buffer left, in index points10.0% of 10.0%
Days left in the period142
Period endsMar 19, 2027
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.95%0.06%
Net assets, TMAR as of Oct 27, 2026 and VWO as of Sep 30, 2026$15m$125.4bn
Holdings
Holdings in commonnot published
In the S&P 500, by weight0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund29.8%

Method

Side by side

TMAR FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - March VWO Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF
Where it sits Buffer ETF Stock ETF
What it is Defined outcome, 10% on EEM Tracks an index of Emerging markets
Total return, 1 year +15.6% +4.8%
Its benchmark over the same days +14.1% (EEM) not measured
Gap to its benchmark +1.5 pts vs EEM not measured
Expense ratio 0.95% 0.06%
Holdings not read by ETFIQ 6515
Net assets, TMAR as of Oct 27, 2026 and VWO as of Sep 30, 2026 $15m $125.4bn

TMAR and VWO on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

TMAR flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
TMAR

From its price on Oct 28, 2026, the fund can gain about 14.8% more before it reaches its cap. The fund's price can fall 11.6% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's number. In index terms, EEM can fall 12.4% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 10.0% of the 10.0% buffer still sits below today's EEM level. 142 days remained on Oct 28, 2026. On Mar 19, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.

VWO

VWO tracks an index of Emerging markets. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +4.8% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 6,515 positions, with the top ten at 29.8%. It sat 7.0% below its high of Sep 4, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Are TMAR and VWO in the same category?
TMAR is a buffer ETF and VWO is a stock ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
Which returned more over the last year, TMAR or VWO?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, TMAR returned +15.6% and VWO +4.8%.
Which is cheaper, TMAR or VWO?
VWO is cheaper, by 0.89 percentage points a year. That is about $89 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, TMAR against VWO, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/tmar-vs-vwo

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.